Abstract:Bacteria like E . coli grow at vastly different rates on different substrates, however, the precise reason for this variability is poorly understood. Different growth rates have been attributed to 'nutrient quality', a key parameter in bacterial growth laws. However, it remains unclear to what extent nutrient quality is rooted in fundamental biochemical constraints like the energy content of nutrients, the protein cost required for their uptake and catabolism, or the capacity of the plasma membrane for nutrient transporters. Here, we show that while nutrient quality is indeed reflected in protein investment in substrate-specific transporters and enzymes, this is not a fundamental limitation on growth rate, at least for certain 'poor' substrates. We show that it is possible to turn mannose, one of the 'poorest' substrates of E . coli , into one of the 'best' substrates by reengineering chromosomal promoters of the mannose transporter and metabolic enzymes required for mannose degradation. This result falls in line with previous observations of more subtle growth rate improvement for many other carbon sources. However, we show that this faster growth rate comes at the cost of diverse cellular capabilities, reflected in longer lag phases, worse starvation survival and lower motility. We show that addition of cAMP to the medium can rescue these phenotypes but imposes a corresponding growth cost. Based on these data, we propose that nutrient quality is largely a self-determined, plastic property that can be modulated by the fraction of proteomic resources devoted to a specific substrate in the much larger proteome sector of catabolically activated genes. Rather than a fundamental biochemical limitation, nutrient quality reflects resource allocation decisions that are shaped by evolution in specific ecological niches and can be quickly adapted if necessary. Bacteria grow at very different rates on different substrates. Therefore, the substrates themselves are often denoted as 'rich' substrates versus 'poor' substrates. However, it remains unclear what makes a nutrient a 'rich' or a 'poor' substrate. A host of different explanations have been suggested, such as the energy content and chemical composition of the nutrient, the amount of protein required for efficient catabolism of the substrate, or limitations of 'space' in the plasma membrane for fitting transporters of the substrate. All of these hypotheses are actively debated today. Here, we show instead that at least for certain substrates, nutrient quality can be a plastic property that can be dialed by evolution. Different nutrients enable bacteria to grow, but they also serve as a major signal that allows microbes to infer information about their environment. We propose that nutrient quality encoded in a combination regulatory architecture and enzymatic properties, serves as both as a map of the safety and reliability of the environment and as a regulatory mechanism that implements proteome allocation decisions.

Conditionally unutilized proteins and their profound effects on growth and adaptation across microbial species

Experimental evolution of metabolism under nutrient restriction: enhanced amino acid catabolism and a key role of branched-chain amino acids

Resource allocation in biochemically structured metabolic networks

Coping with stress: How bacteria fine-tune protein synthesis and protein transport

Plasticity of growth laws tunes resource allocation strategies in bacteria

A coarse-grained resource allocation model of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in unicellular microbes

Decoupling of Rates of Protein Synthesis from Cell Expansion Leads to Supergrowth

How Does Escherichia coli Allocate Proteome?

Understanding and mathematical modelling of cellular resource allocation in microorganisms: a comparative synthesis

The catabolic nature of fermentative substrates influence proteomic rewiring in Escherichia coli under anoxic growth

Selective autophagy of ribosomes balances a tradeoff between starvation survival and growth resumption

Optimal resource allocation in micro-organisms under periodic nutrient fluctuations

Microbial metabolism: optimal control of uptake versus synthesis

Do Amino Acid Biosynthetic Costs Constrain Protein Evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae?

Global and gene-specific translational regulation in Escherichia coli across different conditions

Coordination of bacterial proteome with metabolism by cyclic AMP signalling

Global pleiotropic effects in adaptively evolved Escherichia coli lacking CRP reveal molecular mechanisms that define the growth physiology

A yield-cost tradeoff governs Escherichia coli’s decision between fermentation and respiration in carbon-limited growth

Probing Biomass Precursor Synthesis as a Key Factor in Microbial Adaptation to Unadapted Carbon Sources

Survival of the cheapest: How proteome cost minimization drives evolution

Protein overabundance is driven by growth robustness