Abstract:It is widely believed that, owing to the limitation of nutrients in natural environments, bacteria spend most of their life in a non-growing state. However, despite its major clinical and ecological implications, very little is known about what determines the phenotype of starved bacteria, in particular what controls the concentration of different gene products inside the cells. Using microfluidics and quantitative fluorescence microscopy, we monitored growth and gene expression in many independent lineages as we switched them from exponential growth to starvation. We observed that all cells stopped growing immediately and that no cell death occurred for more than two days. At the same time, gene expression undergoes a dramatic remodeling upon entry into starvation in a promoter-dependent manner. Some promoters, including ribosomal protein promoters, arrest gene expression immediately, others show a slow exponential decay of expression on a 10 h time scale, while a third category exhibits a transient burst of activity before decaying exponentially. Remarkably, the time dynamics of these changes are highly homogeneous across single cells. In addition, we demonstrated that the gene expression response does not qualitatively depend on the dynamics of starvation entry. Combining the observed time-dependent protein production and decay rates, we showed with mathematical modeling that a delay between growth arrest and shutdown of gene expression allows a massive increase in the concentration of certain proteins without requiring an upregulation of their expression. Moreover, protein concentrations deep in starvation appeared to be mainly determined by the expression dynamics during the first 10 h of starvation. Finally, we established that this expression program at the onset of starvation is critical for cell viability. In particular, by inhibiting gene expression during different periods of starvation, we were able to show that the tolerance to stress after 2 days is determined by gene expression occurring during the first 10 h, which thus constitutes a preventive response. These results provide a starting point for quantitative studies of cell maintenance and the emergence of specific phenotypes when nutrients become scarce.

Selective autophagy of ribosomes balances a tradeoff between starvation survival and growth resumption

Experimental evolution of metabolism under nutrient restriction: enhanced amino acid catabolism and a key role of branched-chain amino acids

leverages growth arrest to remodel its proteome upon entry into starvation

Autophagy in metazoans: cell survival in the land of plenty

The catabolic nature of fermentative substrates influence proteomic rewiring in Escherichia coli under anoxic growth

Autophagy-dependent Ribosomal RNA Degradation is Essential for Maintaining Nucleotide Homeostasis During C. Elegans Development

Coordinate Regulation of Ribosome and tRNA Biogenesis Controls Hypoxic Injury and Translation

TOR and MAP kinase pathways synergistically regulate autophagy in response to nutrient depletion in fission yeast

Anabolic Function Downstream of TOR Controls Trade-offs Between Longevity and Reproduction at the Level of Specific Tissues in C. elegans

Termination of Autophagy and Reformation of Lysosomes Regulated by Mtor

The Energy Requirements of Ion Homeostasis Determine the Lifespan of Starving Bacteria

Elongation factor eEF2 kinase and autophagy jointly promote survival of cancer cells

Evolutionary Consequence of A Trade-Off Between Growth and Maintenance along with Ribosomal Damages

Starvation-induced metabolic rewiring affects mTORC1 composition in vivo

Optimal control of ribosome population for gene expression under periodic nutrient intake

Ribosomes hibernate on mitochondria during cellular stress

Title the Ccl 1 – Kin 28 Kinase Complex Regulates Autophagyunder Nitrogen Starvation

Integrated proteasomal and lysosomal activity shape mTOR-regulated proteome remodeling

Bacteria adapt nutrient deprivation by reducing vacant 70S ribosomes via the silencing factor RsfS

Different levels of catabolite repression optimize growth in stable and variable environments.

A yield-cost tradeoff governs Escherichia coli’s decision between fermentation and respiration in carbon-limited growth