Abstract:Bacteria like E . coli grow at vastly different rates on different substrates, however, the precise reason for this variability is poorly understood. Different growth rates have been attributed to 'nutrient quality', a key parameter in bacterial growth laws. However, it remains unclear to what extent nutrient quality is rooted in fundamental biochemical constraints like the energy content of nutrients, the protein cost required for their uptake and catabolism, or the capacity of the plasma membrane for nutrient transporters. Here, we show that while nutrient quality is indeed reflected in protein investment in substrate-specific transporters and enzymes, this is not a fundamental limitation on growth rate, at least for certain 'poor' substrates. We show that it is possible to turn mannose, one of the 'poorest' substrates of E . coli , into one of the 'best' substrates by reengineering chromosomal promoters of the mannose transporter and metabolic enzymes required for mannose degradation. This result falls in line with previous observations of more subtle growth rate improvement for many other carbon sources. However, we show that this faster growth rate comes at the cost of diverse cellular capabilities, reflected in longer lag phases, worse starvation survival and lower motility. We show that addition of cAMP to the medium can rescue these phenotypes but imposes a corresponding growth cost. Based on these data, we propose that nutrient quality is largely a self-determined, plastic property that can be modulated by the fraction of proteomic resources devoted to a specific substrate in the much larger proteome sector of catabolically activated genes. Rather than a fundamental biochemical limitation, nutrient quality reflects resource allocation decisions that are shaped by evolution in specific ecological niches and can be quickly adapted if necessary. Bacteria grow at very different rates on different substrates. Therefore, the substrates themselves are often denoted as 'rich' substrates versus 'poor' substrates. However, it remains unclear what makes a nutrient a 'rich' or a 'poor' substrate. A host of different explanations have been suggested, such as the energy content and chemical composition of the nutrient, the amount of protein required for efficient catabolism of the substrate, or limitations of 'space' in the plasma membrane for fitting transporters of the substrate. All of these hypotheses are actively debated today. Here, we show instead that at least for certain substrates, nutrient quality can be a plastic property that can be dialed by evolution. Different nutrients enable bacteria to grow, but they also serve as a major signal that allows microbes to infer information about their environment. We propose that nutrient quality encoded in a combination regulatory architecture and enzymatic properties, serves as both as a map of the safety and reliability of the environment and as a regulatory mechanism that implements proteome allocation decisions.

Protein overabundance is driven by growth robustness

Protein overabundance is driven by growth robustness

Noise robustness and metabolic load determine the principles of central dogma regulation

Impact of Maximal Overexpression of a Non-toxic Protein on Yeast Cell Physiology

Protein abundances and interactions coevolve to promote functional complexes while suppressing non-specific binding

Gene expression tradeoffs determine bacterial survival and adaptation to antibiotic stress

Modeling and measuring how codon usage modulates the relationship between burden and yield during protein overexpression in bacteria

The one-message-per-cell-cycle rule: A conserved minimum transcription level for essential genes

Optimal control of ribosome population for gene expression under periodic nutrient intake

A fitness trade-off between growth and survival governed by Spo0A-mediated proteome allocation constraints in Bacillus subtilis

Plasticity of growth laws tunes resource allocation strategies in bacteria

The hallmarks of a tradeoff in transcriptomes that balances stress and growth functions

The proteome is a terminal electron acceptor

Inflating Bacterial Cells by Increased Protein Synthesis.

A yield-cost tradeoff governs Escherichia coli’s decision between fermentation and respiration in carbon-limited growth

Decoupling of Rates of Protein Synthesis from Cell Expansion Leads to Supergrowth

Stringent response ensures the timely adaptation of bacterial growth to nutrient downshift

Genome-Wide Quantification of the Effect of Gene Overexpression on Escherichia coli Growth