On the Liveliness of Artificial Life

Yong Zher Koh,Maurice HT Ling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.10196

2023-02-19

Abstract:There has been on-going philosophical debate on whether artificial life models, also known as digital organisms, are truly alive. The main difficulty appears to be finding an encompassing and definite definition of life. By examining similarities and differences in recent definitions of life, we define life as "any system with a boundary to confine the system within a definite volume and protect the system from external effects, consisting of a program that is capable of improvisation, able to react and adapt to the environment, able to regenerate parts of it-self or its entirety, with energy system comprises of non-interference sets of secluded reactions for self-sustenance, is considered alive or a living system. Any incomplete system containing a program and can be re-assembled into a living system; thereby, converting the reassembled system for the purpose of the incomplete system, are also considered alive." Using this definition, we argue that digital organisms may not be the boundary case of life even though some digital organisms are not considered alive; thereby, taking the view that some form of digital organisms can be considered alive. In addition, we present an experimental framework based on continuity of the overall system and potential discontinuity of elements within the system for testing future definitions of life.

Neural and Evolutionary Computing,Cell Behavior

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the philosophical debate on whether artificial life models (also known as digital organisms) truly possess the properties of life. Specifically, the paper aims to evaluate whether certain forms of digital organisms can be regarded as alive by proposing an all - encompassing definition of life. Through the analysis of existing definitions of life, the authors propose a new definition of life and, based on this definition, argue that certain digital organisms may be considered alive. In addition, the paper also provides an experimental framework for testing future hypotheses regarding the continuity of the definition of life and the potential discontinuity of elements.

The key to the paper lies in solving the following core problems:
1. **Challenges in Defining Life**: How to find a comprehensive and unambiguous definition of life so as to clearly distinguish between living and non - living systems.
2. **Life Properties of Digital Organisms**: According to the proposed new definition of life, evaluate whether digital organisms meet the conditions of life, especially whether they have boundaries, self - replication ability, the ability to adapt to the environment, and an energy - metabolism system and other characteristics.
3. **Construction of an Experimental Framework**: Propose an experimental framework based on the overall continuity of the system and the potential discontinuity of internal elements to verify future definitions of life.

Through these discussions, the paper hopes to promote the understanding of the nature of life and provide theoretical support for artificial - life research.