Assessment of the specificity of cardiopulmonary response during tethered swimming using a new snorkel device

Marco Pinna,Raffaele Milia,Silvana Roberto,Elisabetta Marongiu,Sergio Olla,Andrea Loi,Matteo Ortu,Gian Mario Migliaccio,Filippo Tocco,Alberto Concu,Antonio Crisafulli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12576-012-0226-7
Abstract:This study aimed at comparing maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)), maximal heart rate (HR(max)), and anaerobic threshold (AT) obtained from tethered swimming (SW) and three other testing procedures: cycling (CY), running (RU), and arm cranking (AC). Variables were assessed in 12 trained male swimmers by a portable gas analyzer connected to a modified snorkel system to allow expired gases collection during swimming. Athletes exhibited a higher VO(2max) during the SW test as compared to the CY and the AC tests. There was no significant difference in VO(2max) between the SW and the RU test, but the Bland and Altman plot highlighted a poor agreement between results. Moreover, AT occurred at higher workloads during SW in comparison to the other tests. These results do not support the use of any unspecific testing procedures to estimate VO(2max), HR(max), and AT for swimming.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?