Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

Better May Not Be Fairer: A Study on Subgroup Discrepancy in Image Classification

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Crowdsourcing Detection of Sampling Biases in Image Datasets

Classes Are Not Equal: An Empirical Study on Image Recognition Fairness

ColorSense: A Study on Color Vision in Machine Visual Recognition

Common-Sense Bias Discovery and Mitigation for Classification Tasks

A Large-Scale Empirical Study on Improving the Fairness of Image Classification Models

Fairness-aware Contrastive Learning with Partially Annotated Sensitive Attributes

Discover and Mitigate Multiple Biased Subgroups in Image Classifiers

Improving Fairness in Image Classification via Sketching

Which Has Better Visual Quality: the Clear Blue Sky or a Blurry Animal?

Towards Reliable Assessments of Demographic Disparities in Multi-Label Image Classifiers

DDI-CoCo: A Dataset For Understanding The Effect Of Color Contrast In Machine-Assisted Skin Disease Detection

Feature Importance Disparities for Data Bias Investigations

ColorNet: Investigating the importance of color spaces for image classification

Learning Discriminative Subspaces on Random Contrasts for Image Saliency Analysis

CLImage: Human-Annotated Datasets for Complementary-Label Learning

A Comprehensive Study of Image Classification Model Sensitivity to Foregrounds, Backgrounds, and Visual Attributes

Understanding Bias in Large-Scale Visual Datasets

Spuriosity Rankings: Sorting Data to Measure and Mitigate Biases

One Label, One Billion Faces: Usage and Consistency of Racial Categories in Computer Vision