Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

Common-Sense Bias Discovery and Mitigation for Classification Tasks

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Crowdsourcing Detection of Sampling Biases in Image Datasets

Language-guided Detection and Mitigation of Unknown Dataset Bias

ViG-Bias: Visually Grounded Bias Discovery and Mitigation

Detection and Evaluation of bias-inducing Features in Machine learning

Discover and Mitigate Multiple Biased Subgroups in Image Classifiers

Partition-and-Debias: Agnostic Biases Mitigation via A Mixture of Biases-Specific Experts

'Propose and Review': Interactive Bias Mitigation for Machine Classifiers

Images Speak Louder than Words: Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Vision-Language Model from a Causal Mediation Perspective

Understanding Bias in Large-Scale Visual Datasets

Contextual Debiasing for Visual Recognition with Causal Mechanisms

Benign Shortcut for Debiasing: Fair Visual Recognition via Intervention with Shortcut Features

A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Bias Mitigation Methods for Machine Learning Classifiers

Discovering and Mitigating Visual Biases through Keyword Explanation

Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Survey

Controlling Bias Exposure for Fair Interpretable Predictions

Evaluating and Mitigating Bias in Image Classifiers: A Causal Perspective Using Counterfactuals

Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biases

Social Debiasing for Fair Multi-modal LLMs

Fair Visual Recognition via Intervention with Proxy Features