Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

Discover and Mitigate Multiple Biased Subgroups in Image Classifiers

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

TESTSGD: Interpretable Testing of Neural Networks Against Subtle Group Discrimination.

Common-Sense Bias Discovery and Mitigation for Classification Tasks

The Role of Subgroup Separability in Group-Fair Medical Image Classification

Looking Beyond What You See: An Empirical Analysis on Subgroup Intersectional Fairness for Multi-label Chest X-ray Classification Using Social Determinants of Racial Health Inequities

Better May Not Be Fairer: A Study on Subgroup Discrepancy in Image Classification

Partition-and-Debias: Agnostic Biases Mitigation via A Mixture of Biases-Specific Experts

Deep Hypothesis Tests Detect Clinically Relevant Subgroup Shifts in Medical Images

Language-guided Detection and Mitigation of Unknown Dataset Bias

Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation Shift

On Learning Fairness and Accuracy on Multiple Subgroups

Algorithmic encoding of protected characteristics in image-based models for disease detection

Feature Importance Disparities for Data Bias Investigations

Fairpriori: Improving Biased Subgroup Discovery for Deep Neural Network Fairness

ViG-Bias: Visually Grounded Bias Discovery and Mitigation

Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias

Towards Reliable Assessments of Demographic Disparities in Multi-Label Image Classifiers

Mitigating Social Biases in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models Via Linguistic-Aligned Attention Guidance

Mitigating Calibration Bias Without Fixed Attribute Grouping for Improved Fairness in Medical Imaging Analysis

Mitigating Group Bias in Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Devices