Abstract:Can egalitarian norms or conventions survive the presence of dominant individuals who are ensured of victory in conflicts? We investigate the interaction of power asymmetry and partner choice in games of conflict over a contested resource. We introduce three models to study the emergence and resilience of cooperation among unequals when interaction is random, when individuals can choose their partners, and where power asymmetries dynamically depend on accumulated payoffs. We find that the ability to avoid bullies with higher competitive ability afforded by partner choice mostly restores cooperative conventions and that the competitive hierarchy never forms. Partner choice counteracts the hyper dominance of bullies who are isolated in the network and eliminates the need for others to coordinate in a coalition. When competitive ability dynamically depends on cumulative payoffs, complex cycles of coupled network-strategy-rank changes emerge. Effective collaborators gain popularity (and thus power), adopt aggressive behavior, get isolated, and ultimately lose power. Neither the network nor behavior converge to a stable equilibrium. Despite the instability of power dynamics, the cooperative convention in the population remains stable overall and long-term inequality is completely eliminated. The interaction between partner choice and dynamic power asymmetry is crucial for these results: without partner choice, bullies cannot be isolated, and without dynamic power asymmetry, bullies do not lose their power even when isolated. We analytically identify a single critical point that marks a phase transition in all three iterations of our models. This critical point is where the first individual breaks from the convention and cycles start to emerge.

The Power of Non-Superpowers

Power relations in Game Theory

A mathematical theory of power

Game of Power Allocation on Networks

Great Power Competition: Lessons from the Past, Implications for the Future

Stackelberg vs. Nash in the Lottery Colonel Blotto Game

Power asymmetry in repeated play of provision and appropriation games

Interplay of Reward and Size of Groups in the Optional Public Goods Game

On the Power of Dominated Players in Team Competitions.

Overcome the Collective Action Problems in Providing International Public Goods

Is power zero-sum or variable-sum? Conceptualizing a context-dependent answer to a century-old debate with two game theoretic experiments

A Coopetition Index for Coalitions in Simple Games

Mean Field Analysis of Two-Party Governance: Competition versus Cooperation among Leaders

A paradox of coalition building in public good provision

Avoiding the bullies: The resilience of cooperation among unequals

The Application of Non-Cooperative Stackelberg Game Theory in Behavioral Science: Social Optimality with any Number of Players

Power in Liquid Democracy

When selection pays: structured public goods game with a generalized interaction mode

Evolution of cooperation in the indefinitely repeated collective action with a contest for power

Social Selection of Game Organizers Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Cooperation and competition between pair and multi-player social games in spatial populations