Abstract:Is power zero-sum (relative gain/loss) or variable-sum (absolute gain/loss)? The response to this century-old puzzle depends on how power manifests itself during human interactions in diverse contexts. While few theoretical contributions investigating this puzzle seek empirical assistance, this paper utilises two game theoretic experiments for an answer. Consisting of a randomly assigned priming treatment followed by a single round of decision-making in a choice game for three groups of participants, it tests how human subjective understanding of power translates into varied objective power exercises in different situations. Findings reveal that in a 'power to' context whereby people mentally value their individual agency more (i.e. freedom from others), they tend to pursue absolute than relative gains, displaying a variable-sum power exercise strategy; in contrast, in a 'power over' context whereby people value their ability to affect others more (i.e. interdependence with others), individuals become relative-gain maximisers, thus viewing the sum of each power exercise as zero. Therefore, we conclude that whether power is zero-sum or variable-sum is context-dependent because how power is framed and subjectively understood by agents (i.e., 'power to' vs. 'power over', as contexts) shape their objective behaviours in power transactions (i.e., 'zero-sum' vs. 'variable-sum' power exercise).

A mathematical theory of power

Power relations in Game Theory

The Power of Non-Superpowers

Understanding Game Theory via Wireless Power Control

A Game Strategy for Power Flow Control of Distributed Generators in Smart Grids

A game theoretical formulation for distributed optimization problems

Game theoretic foundations of the Gately power measure for directed networks

Approximating power indices: theoretical and empirical analysis

A New Game Equivalence, Its Logic and Algebra

Theory and Practical Application Based on Game Theory

Game of Power Allocation on Networks

Power accretion in social systems

Power in Liquid Democracy

On Engineering Game Theory with Its Application in Power Systems

Coalitional Game Theory in Power Systems: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

Power asymmetry destabilizes reciprocal cooperation in social dilemmas

Is power zero-sum or variable-sum? Conceptualizing a context-dependent answer to a century-old debate with two game theoretic experiments

On benefits of cooperation under strategic power

Game-Theoretic Analysis of Adversarial Decision Making in a Complex Sociophysical System

With a little help from my friends: essentiality vs opportunity in group criticality

Axiomatization of some power indices in voting games with abstention