Abstract:Machine learning (ML) techniques have become pervasive across a range of different applications, and are now widely used in areas as disparate as recidivism prediction, consumer credit-risk analysis, and insurance pricing. Likewise, in the physical world, ML models are critical components in autonomous agents such as robotic surgeons and self-driving cars. Among the many ethical dimensions that arise in the use of ML technology in such applications, analyzing morally permissible actions is both immediate and profound. For example, there is the potential for learned algorithms to become biased against certain groups. More generally, in so much that the decisions of ML models impact society, both virtually (e.g., denying a loan) and physically (e.g., driving into a pedestrian), notions of accountability, blame and responsibility need to be carefully considered. In this article, we advocate for a two-pronged approach ethical decision-making enabled using rich models of autonomous agency: on the one hand, we need to draw on philosophical notions of such as beliefs, causes, effects and intentions, and look to formalise them, as attempted by the knowledge representation community, but on the other, from a computational perspective, such theories need to also address the problems of tractable reasoning and (probabilistic) knowledge acquisition. As a concrete instance of this tradeoff, we report on a few preliminary results that apply (propositional) tractable probabilistic models to problems in fair ML and automated reasoning of moral principles. Such models are compilation targets for certain types of knowledge representation languages, and can effectively reason in service some computational tasks. They can also be learned from data. Concretely, current evidence suggests that they are attractive structures for jointly addressing three fundamental challenges: reasoning about possible worlds + tractable computation + knowledge acquisition. Thus, these seems like a good starting point for modelling reasoning robots as part of the larger ecosystem where accountability and responsibility is understood more broadly.

Macro Ethics Principles for Responsible AI Systems: Taxonomy and Future Directions

Responsible (use of) AI

Responsible AI and moral responsibility: a common appreciation

Implementing Responsible AI: Tensions and Trade-Offs Between Ethics Aspects

A Human Rights-Based Approach to Responsible AI

Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI

Resolving Ethics Trade-offs in Implementing Responsible AI

Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies

AI Ethics Principles in Practice: Perspectives of Designers and Developers

Computer Says I Don’t Know: An Empirical Approach to Capture Moral Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence

Ethics of AI as practical ethics

Ethics as a service: a pragmatic operationalisation of AI Ethics

From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices

Extensionally defining principles and cases in ethics: An AI model

Contextualizing Artificially Intelligent Morality: A Meta-Ethnography of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Hybrid Models for Theoretical and Applied Ethics in Artificial Intelligence

Operationalising AI ethics: barriers, enablers and next steps

Artificial intelligence governance: Ethical considerations and implications for social responsibility

A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society

Knowledge representation and acquisition for ethical AI: challenges and opportunities

From Principles to Practice: A Deep Dive into AI Ethics and Regulations

AI virtues -- The missing link in putting AI ethics into practice