Contextualizing Artificially Intelligent Morality: A Meta-Ethnography of Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Hybrid Models for Theoretical and Applied Ethics in Artificial Intelligence

Jennafer S. Roberts,Laura N. Montoya

2022-04-16

Abstract:In this meta-ethnography, we explore three different angles of ethical artificial intelligence (AI) design implementation including the philosophical ethical viewpoint, the technical perspective, and framing through a political lens. Our qualitative research includes a literature review that highlights the cross-referencing of these angles by discussing the value and drawbacks of contrastive top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches previously published. The novel contribution to this framework is the political angle, which constitutes ethics in AI either being determined by corporations and governments and imposed through policies or law (coming from the top), or ethics being called for by the people (coming from the bottom), as well as top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid technicalities of how AI is developed within a moral construct and in consideration of its users, with expected and unexpected consequences and long-term impact in the world. There is a focus on reinforcement learning as an example of a bottom-up applied technical approach and AI ethics principles as a practical top-down approach. This investigation includes real-world case studies to impart a global perspective, as well as philosophical debate on the ethics of AI and theoretical future thought experimentation based on historical facts, current world circumstances, and possible ensuing realities.

Artificial Intelligence,General Literature,Human-Computer Interaction,Computers and Society,Neural and Evolutionary Computing

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses the ethical framework of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly analyzing the implementation of AI ethical design from three perspectives: theory, technology, and politics. By conducting a literature review, the author emphasizes the application of top-down, bottom-up, and mixed methods in AI ethics and introduces a political perspective to discuss how AI ethics may be determined by enterprises and governments through policies and laws, or generated through public demands.

The paper points out that the complexity of AI ethics lies in the global deployment of AI, which requires considering multiple angles. There is no fixed correct method to create ethical AI. Top-down ethics typically rely on rule systems, which may stem from philosophical theories or principles designated by authorities. Bottom-up ethics are based on experiential learning, such as reinforcement learning, or driven by the needs of technical users. The paper also mentions mixed methods, which combine characteristics of both top-down and bottom-up approaches.

Through case studies, the author provides a global perspective to discuss AI ethical principles (such as fairness) and technological implementations (such as programming and machine learning), as well as political influences, such as how power affects AI ethics. The paper argues that despite the existence of technical challenges, the implementation of AI ethics needs to be carefully managed at each stage, in order to correct social injustices and redefine moral meaning in the digital era.

Keywords include artificial intelligence, ethics, reinforcement learning, and politics. The goal of the paper is to deepen the understanding of the ethical development of AI and provide a framework for future ethical AI development.