Resolving Ethics Trade-offs in Implementing Responsible AI

Conrad Sanderson,Emma Schleiger,David Douglas,Petra Kuhnert,Qinghua Lu

2024-04-01

Abstract:While the operationalisation of high-level AI ethics principles into practical AI/ML systems has made progress, there is still a theory-practice gap in managing tensions between the underlying AI ethics aspects. We cover five approaches for addressing the tensions via trade-offs, ranging from rudimentary to complex. The approaches differ in the types of considered context, scope, methods for measuring contexts, and degree of justification. None of the approaches is likely to be appropriate for all organisations, systems, or applications. To address this, we propose a framework which consists of: (i) proactive identification of tensions, (ii) prioritisation and weighting of ethics aspects, (iii) justification and documentation of trade-off decisions. The proposed framework aims to facilitate the implementation of well-rounded AI/ML systems that are appropriate for potential regulatory requirements.

Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to manage and resolve the tensions and trade - offs between different AI ethics aspects when implementing responsible artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Although some progress has been made in translating high - level AI ethical principles into practical AI/ML systems, there is still a gap between theory and practice when dealing with the conflicts between these ethical aspects. Specifically:

1. **Gap between theory and practice**: Although many high - level AI ethical principles have been formulated worldwide, in actual operation, how to manage the tensions and trade - offs between these principles remains a challenge.

2. **Conflicts in ethical aspects**: Different AI ethical aspects (such as accuracy, fairness, privacy, interpretability, etc.) may conflict in practice. For example, improving accuracy may affect the interpretability of the system, and enhancing privacy protection may reduce the performance of the system.

3. **Lack of a unified framework**: Currently, there is no widely - accepted framework to systematically solve these ethical trade - off problems. Many designers and developers are not fully aware of these ethical conflicts or are unwilling to deal with these problems.

To solve these problems, the paper proposes a multi - level framework aimed at helping organizations and individuals better manage and resolve ethical conflicts during the design and implementation of AI/ML systems. This framework consists of three main components:

1. **Proactive identification**: In the early stages of AI/ML system design, proactively identify potential ethical conflicts and consider how to resolve them.

2. **Priority and weight assignment**: Rank the priorities and assign weights to different ethical aspects according to the specific context and requirements. This can be achieved through qualitative or quantitative methods.

3. **Justification and documentation**: Provide specific justifications for each trade - off decision and record the process of these decisions in detail to ensure transparency and traceability.

Through this framework, the paper hopes to promote the comprehensive design and implementation of AI/ML systems, making them comply with potential regulatory requirements and better balance different ethical aspects in practice.