Abstract:In a multi-party fair coin-flipping protocol, the parties output a common (close to) unbiased bit, even when some adversarial parties try to bias the output. In this work we focus on the case of an arbitrary number of corrupted parties. Cleve [STOC 1986] has shown that in any such $m$-round coin-flipping protocol, the corrupted parties can bias the honest parties' common output bit by $\Theta(1/m)$. For more than two decades, the best known coin-flipping protocol was the one of Awerbuch et al. [Manuscript 1985], who presented a $t$-party, $m$-round protocol with bias $\Theta(t/\sqrt{m})$. This was changed by the breakthrough result of Moran et al. [TCC 2009], who constructed an $m$-round, two-party coin-flipping protocol with optimal bias $\Theta(1/m)$. Haitner and Tsfadia [STOC 2014] constructed an $m$-round, three-party coin-flipping protocol with bias $O(\log^3m / m)$. Still for the case of more than three parties, the best known protocol remained the $\Theta(t/\sqrt{m})$-bias protocol of Awerbuch et al. We make a step towards eliminating the above gap, presenting a $t$-party, $m$-round coin-flipping protocol, with bias $O(\frac{t^4 \cdot 2^t \cdot \sqrt{\log m}}{m^{1/2+1/\left(2^{t-1}-2\right)}})$ for any $t\le \tfrac12 \log\log m$. This improves upon the $\Theta(t/\sqrt{m})$-bias protocol of Awerbuch et al., and in particular, for $t\in O(1)$ it is an $1/m^{\frac12 + \Theta(1)}$-bias protocol. For the three-party case, it is an $O(\sqrt{\log m}/m)$-bias protocol, improving over the $O(\log^3m / m)$-bias protocol of Haitner and Tsfadia. Our protocol generalizes that of Haitner and Tsfadia, by presenting an appropriate recovery protocol for the remaining parties to interact in, in the case that some parties abort or are caught cheating. We prove the fairness of the new protocol by presenting a new paradigm for analyzing fairness of coin-flipping protocols.

How to make the toss fair in cricket?

Fairly Random: The Impact of Winning the Toss on the Probability of Winning

Making the Rules of Sports Fairer

How to Lose with Least Probability

Fairer Shootouts in Soccer: The $m-n$ Rule

Throw One's Cake --- and Have It Too

Bernoulli Runs: Using "Book Cricket" to Evaluate Cricketers

Individual and team performance in cricket

The fairness of transparent constrained assignments: The role of draw order

On cases where Litt's game is fair

Are seven-game baseball playoffs fairer than five-game series when home-field advantage is considered?

Cherry on the Cake: Fairness is NOT an Optimization Problem

Does the first-serving team have a structural advantage in pickleball?

A Fair Shake: How close can the sum of $n$-sided dice be to a uniform distribution?

Fair coins tend to land on the same side they started: Evidence from 350,757 flips

Fair Coin Flipping: Tighter Analysis and the Many-Party Case

On the Fair Division of a Random Object

How to Answer Questions of the Type: If you toss a coin n times, how likely is HH to show up more than HT?

Probability and Fairness

A Balance for Fairness: Fair Distribution Utilising Physics in Games of Characteristic Function Form

Quantum mechanics can provide unbiased result