Abstract:Objective: Oral cancer ranks in the top three of all cancers in India, accounting for over 30% of all cancers reported. Elective neck dissection (END) is the mainstay of treatment in early disease. Performing ENDs for node negative (N0) patients can result in significant morbidity with questionable benefit and impair the patients' quality of life. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB), is an emerging investigation helping in risk stratification of patients with early oral cancer and node negative disease. SLNB is a simple, easy to perform investigation with a high sensitivity and plays a major role in avoiding neck dissection. Studies have compared SLNB-based neck dissection with END in early oral cancers, and also on survival benefit with prophylactic neck dissection at the time of primary surgery as compared to watchful waiting followed by therapeutic neck dissection for nodal relapse, in patients with clinical N0 (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) on literature search. Aim: Our primary aim was to determine the effectiveness of lymphoscintigraphy in OSCC in clinically neck node negative (cN0) patients in comparison to gold standard END for nodal metastases identification and secondly to assess the utility of gamma probe in guiding SLNB in this group of patients. Materials and methods: Fifty-eight patients (M:F = 42:16) with histologically confirmed OSCC of T1-3 stage with cN0 and planned for curative intent primary surgical treatment were divided into two arms. All patients underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) imaging and biopsy. Arm 1 underwent nodal dissection based on SLNB positivity, while all patients in arm 2 had wide neck dissection irrespective of SLNB findings. Results: SLN was detected in all 58 patients, 96.4% patients showed SLN immediately postinjection. More than one SLN was found in 94.3% patients and 6.8% patients showed contralateral SLN also. Higher proportion of nodal metastasis were observed in tongue cancers than in remaining floor of mouth and buccal mucosa cancers (38% vs 12%, P< 0.01). We also found significant association between T size and nodal metastasis in our series. Sensitivity of SLNB was 88.23% with a specificity of 100%, both for SLN imaging and gamma probing localization reflecting the reliability of this technique. Serial step sectioning at 150 micrometre is recommended. SLNB showed positive nodes in 29.3 % patients with cN0 neck. We found that the association between the outcome in both arms was not statistically significant. On follow-up, three patients with T3N0 OSCC of arm 2 had nodal recurrence/lung metastases. One patient of arm 1 had nodal recurrence. Two patients expired within one year. As high as 73% patients (22 negative necks out of 30) had unwarranted neck dissection in arm 2. Conclusion: SLNB is an effective method to circumvent unwarranted neck dissection in early OSCC and prevent complications. Gamma probing is a robust and easy tool to identify SLN in T1-3 stages with N0 necks clinically. A positive SLNB is found to be reliable in guiding neck dissection in this small study. Larger studies are warranted to establish its recommendation in routine clinical practice.

Comparison of morbidity between sentinel node biopsy and elective neck dissection for treatment of the n0 neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

Neck and Shoulder Morbidity in Patients with Oral Cancer and Clinically Negative Node Neck Status: A Comparison between the Elective Neck Dissection and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Strategies

Sentinel node biopsy versus elective neck dissection in early-stage oral cancer: a systematic review

Health‐related quality of life, functional outcomes, and complications after sentinel lymph node biopsy and elective neck dissection in early oral cancer: A systematic review

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity with a clinically N0 neck: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective studies

Sentinel Node Biopsy or Neck Dissection for Early-Stage Oral Cancer For Long Term Follow-Up: Matched-Pair Analysis for pN0 Necks

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus elective neck dissection in management of the clinically negative (cN0) neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Effectiveness of sentinel lymph node scintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probing with gold standard elective neck dissection in patients with N0 oral squamous cell cancers

Supraomohyoid neck dissection and modified radical neck dissection for clinically node-negative oral squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of prognosis, complications and quality of life

Selective Versus Comprehensive Neck Dissection in the Treatment of Patients with a Pathologically Node-Positive Neck with or Without Microscopic Extracapsular Spread in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Results of a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving neck dissection in clinically node-negative squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity

The Limited Role of Elective Neck Dissection in Patients with Cn0 Salivary Gland Carcinoma.

Post-operative arm morbidity and quality of life. Results of the ALMANAC randomised trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with standard axillary treatment in the management of patients with early breast cancer

Assessment of level IIB lymph nodes in oral cancer - Should we spare or care?

Postoperative morbidity after different types of selective neck dissection

Efficacy of selective neck dissection: a review of 123 cases of elective and therapeutic treatment of the neck in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck]

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective single-center analysis

Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial

2b or not 2b? Shoulder function after level 2b neck dissection: A double‐blind randomized controlled clinical trial

Limited neck dissection: is it enough in early oral tongue cancer? Retrospective study