Indications for elective neck dissection in cT1N0M0 oral cavity cancer according to the AJCC eight edition: A nationwide study
Chih-Yen Chien,Cheng Ping Wang,Li-Yu Lee,Shu-Ru Lee,Shu-Hang Ng,Chung-Jan Kang,Jin-Ching Lin,Shyuang-Der Terng,Chun-Hung Hua,Tsung-Ming Chen,Wen-Cheng Chen,Yao-Te Tsai,Chi-Ying Tsai,Ying-Hsia Chu,Chien-Yu Lin,Kang-Hsing Fan,Hung-Ming Wang,Chia-Hsun Hsieh,Chih-Hua Yeh,Chih-Hung Lin,Chung-Kan Tsao,Nai-Ming Cheng,Tuan-Jen Fang,Shiang-Fu Huang,Li-Ang Lee,Ku-Hao Fang,Yu-Chien Wang,Wan-Ni Lin,Li-Jen Hsin,Tzu-Chen Yen,Yu-Wen Wen,Chun-Ta Liao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106366
IF: 5.972
2023-05-01
Oral Oncology
Abstract:OBJECTIVES: According to the NCCN guidelines, there is weak evidence to support the use of elective neck dissection (END) in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). We sought to examine the indications for END in patients with cT1N0M0 OCSCC defined according to the AJCC Staging Manual, Eight Edition.METHODS: Of the 3886 patients diagnosed with cT1N0M0 included in the study, 2065 underwent END and 1821 neck observation.RESULTS: The 5-year outcomes for patients who received END versus neck observation before and after propensity score matching (n = 1406 each) were as follows: neck control, 96 %/90 % (before matching), p < 0.0001; 96 %/90 % (after matching), p < 0.0001; disease-specific survival (DSS), 93 %/92 % (before matching), p = 0.0227; 93 %/92 % (after matching), p = 0.1436. Multivariable analyses revealed that neck observation, depth of invasion (DOI) > 2.5 mm, and poor differentiation were independent risk factors for 5-year outcomes. Upon the application of a scoring system ranging from 0 (no risk factor) to 3 (presence of the three risk factors), the following 5-year rates were observed: neck control, 98 %/95 %/84 %/85 %; DSS, 96 %/93 %/88 %/85 %; and overall survival, 90 %/86 %/79 %/59 %, respectively (all p < 0.0001). The survival outcomes of patients with scores of 0 and 1 were similar. The occult metastasis rates in the entire study cohort, DOI > 2.5 mm, and poor differentiation were 6.8 %/9.2 %/17.1 %, respectively.CONCLUSION: Because all patients who received neck observation had a score of 1 or higher, END should be performed when a DOI > 2.5 mm or poorly differentiated tumors are present. Under these circumstances, 48.6 % (1888/3886) of cT1N0M0 patients may avoid END without compromising oncological outcomes.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,oncology