Abstract:Data integration, the joint statistical analysis of data from different observation platforms, is pivotal for data‐hungry disciplines such as spatial ecology. Pooled data types obtained from the same underlying process, analyzed jointly, can improve both precision and accuracy in models of species distributions and species–habitat associations. However, the integration of telemetry and spatial survey data has proved elusive because of the fundamentally different analytical approaches required by these two data types. Here, "spatial survey" denotes a survey that records spatial locations and has no temporal structure, for example, line or point transects but not capture–recapture or telemetry. Step selection functions (SSFs—the canonical framework for telemetry) and habitat selection functions (HSFs—the default approach to spatial surveys) differ in not only their specifications but also their results. By imposing the constraint that microscopic mechanisms (animal movement) must correctly scale up to macroscopic emergence (population distributions), a relationship can be written between SSFs and HSFs, leading to a joint likelihood using both datasets. We implement this approach using maximum likelihood, explore its estimation precision by systematic simulation, and seek to derive broad guidelines for effort allocation in the field. We find that complementarities in spatial coverage and resolution between telemetry and survey data often lead to marked inferential improvements in joint analyses over those using either data type alone. The optimal allocation of effort between the two methods (or the choice between them, if only one can be selected) depends on the overall effort expended and the pattern of environmental heterogeneity. Examining inferential performance over a broad range of scenarios for the relative cost between the two methods, we find that integrated analysis usually offers higher precision. Our methodological work shows how to integrate the analysis of telemetry and spatial survey data under a novel joint likelihood function, using traditional computational methods. Our simulation experiments suggest that even when the relative costs of the two methods favor the deployment of one field approach over another, their joint use is broadly preferable. Therefore, joint analysis of the two key methods used in spatial ecology is not only possible but also computationally efficient and statistically more powerful.

Localized Mutual Information Monitoring of Pairwise Associations in Animal Movement

An Information Theory Treatment of Animal Movement Tracks

Using Spatially Explicit Simulated Data to Analyze Animal Interactions: A Case Study with Brown Hyenas in Northern Botswana

Accounting for phenology in the analysis of animal movement

Using piecewise regression to identify biological phenomena in biotelemetry datasets

Sparse movement data can reveal social influences on individual travel decisions

Basis Function Models for Animal Movement

A novel process to infer the reliability of ecological information derived from passive acoustic telemetry track reconstruction

Observed Herd Size and Animal Association

Animal tracking moves community ecology: Opportunities and challenges

Machine Learning for Inferring Animal Behavior from Location and Movement Data

An Information-Theoretic Approach to Detect the Associations of GPS-Tracked Heifers in Pasture

An information-theory approach to geometry for animal groups

Detecting changes in dynamic social networks using multiply-labeled movement data

Classifying behavior from short-interval biologging data: An example with GPS tracking of birds

Joint inference for telemetry and spatial survey data

Camera trapping and telemetry for detecting and quantifying animal interactions: Not anything goes

What is the animal doing? Tools for exploring behavioural structure in animal movements

Joint species distribution models with imperfect detection for high-dimensional spatial data

Changing measurements or changing movements? Sampling scale and movement model identifiability across generations of biologging technology

Flexible discrete space models of animal movement