Abstract:Data integration, the joint statistical analysis of data from different observation platforms, is pivotal for data‐hungry disciplines such as spatial ecology. Pooled data types obtained from the same underlying process, analyzed jointly, can improve both precision and accuracy in models of species distributions and species–habitat associations. However, the integration of telemetry and spatial survey data has proved elusive because of the fundamentally different analytical approaches required by these two data types. Here, "spatial survey" denotes a survey that records spatial locations and has no temporal structure, for example, line or point transects but not capture–recapture or telemetry. Step selection functions (SSFs—the canonical framework for telemetry) and habitat selection functions (HSFs—the default approach to spatial surveys) differ in not only their specifications but also their results. By imposing the constraint that microscopic mechanisms (animal movement) must correctly scale up to macroscopic emergence (population distributions), a relationship can be written between SSFs and HSFs, leading to a joint likelihood using both datasets. We implement this approach using maximum likelihood, explore its estimation precision by systematic simulation, and seek to derive broad guidelines for effort allocation in the field. We find that complementarities in spatial coverage and resolution between telemetry and survey data often lead to marked inferential improvements in joint analyses over those using either data type alone. The optimal allocation of effort between the two methods (or the choice between them, if only one can be selected) depends on the overall effort expended and the pattern of environmental heterogeneity. Examining inferential performance over a broad range of scenarios for the relative cost between the two methods, we find that integrated analysis usually offers higher precision. Our methodological work shows how to integrate the analysis of telemetry and spatial survey data under a novel joint likelihood function, using traditional computational methods. Our simulation experiments suggest that even when the relative costs of the two methods favor the deployment of one field approach over another, their joint use is broadly preferable. Therefore, joint analysis of the two key methods used in spatial ecology is not only possible but also computationally efficient and statistically more powerful.

Joint inference for telemetry and spatial survey data

Incorporating telemetry information into capture‐recapture analyses improves precision and accuracy of abundance estimates given spatiotemporally biased recapture effort

Joint species distribution models with imperfect detection for high-dimensional spatial data

Bayesian hierarchical space-time models to improve multispecies assessment by combining observations from disparate fish surveys

Estimating animal utilization distributions from multiple data types: a joint spatio-temporal point process framework

Spatiotemporal modelling of abundance from multiple data sources in an integrated spatial distribution model

Melding Wildlife Surveys to Improve Conservation Inference

Integrating Resource Selection Information with Spatial Capture-Recapture

A spatial modeling framework for monitoring surveys with different sampling protocols with a case study for bird abundance in mid-Scandinavia

Integrating counts from rigorous surveys and participatory science to better understand spatiotemporal variation in population processes

Joint Spatial Modeling Bridges the Gap Between Disparate Disease Surveillance and Population Monitoring Efforts Informing Conservation of At-risk Bat Species

Improved state-space models for inference about spatial and temporal variation in abundance from count data

Integrating citizen science data with expert surveys increases accuracy and spatial extent of species distribution models

A novel process to infer the reliability of ecological information derived from passive acoustic telemetry track reconstruction

Camera trapping and telemetry for detecting and quantifying animal interactions: Not anything goes

Should we exploit opportunistic databases with joint species distribution models? Artificial and real data suggest it depends on the sampling completeness

Basis Function Models for Animal Movement

Joint Species Distribution Modeling of Percentage Cover Data with Exclusive Competition for Space

Spatial Joint Species N-Mixture Models for Multi-Source Observational Data with Application to Wild Deer Population Abundance

A comparison of joint species distribution models for presence–absence data

Capitalising on Opportunistic Data for Monitoring Species Relative Abundances