Abstract:1 Biogeographical models of species’ distributions are essential tools for assessing impacts of changing environmental conditions on natural communities and ecosystems. Practitioners need more reliable predictions to integrate into conservation planning (e.g. reserve design and management). 2 Most models still largely ignore or inappropriately take into account important features of species’ distributions, such as spatial autocorrelation, dispersal and migration, biotic and environmental interactions. Whether distributions of natural communities or ecosystems are better modelled by assembling individual species’ predictions in a bottom‐up approach or modelled as collective entities is another important issue. An international workshop was organized to address these issues. 3 We discuss more specifically six issues in a methodological framework for generalized regression: (i) links with ecological theory; (ii) optimal use of existing data and artificially generated data; (iii) incorporating spatial context; (iv) integrating ecological and environmental interactions; (v) assessing prediction errors and uncertainties; and (vi) predicting distributions of communities or collective properties of biodiversity. 4 Synthesis and applications. Better predictions of the effects of impacts on biological communities and ecosystems can emerge only from more robust species’ distribution models and better documentation of the uncertainty associated with these models. An improved understanding of causes of species’ distributions, especially at their range limits, as well as of ecological assembly rules and ecosystem functioning, is necessary if further progress is to be made. A better collaborative effort between theoretical and functional ecologists, ecological modellers and statisticians is required to reach these goals. Biogeographical models of species’ distributions are essential tools for assessing impacts of changing environmental conditions on natural communities and ecosystems. Practitioners need more reliable predictions to integrate into conservation planning (e.g. reserve design and management). Most models still largely ignore or inappropriately take into account important features of species’ distributions, such as spatial autocorrelation, dispersal and migration, biotic and environmental interactions. Whether distributions of natural communities or ecosystems are better modelled by assembling individual species’ predictions in a bottom‐up approach or modelled as collective entities is another important issue. An international workshop was organized to address these issues. We discuss more specifically six issues in a methodological framework for generalized regression: (i) links with ecological theory; (ii) optimal use of existing data and artificially generated data; (iii) incorporating spatial context; (iv) integrating ecological and environmental interactions; (v) assessing prediction errors and uncertainties; and (vi) predicting distributions of communities or collective properties of biodiversity. Synthesis and applications. Better predictions of the effects of impacts on biological communities and ecosystems can emerge only from more robust species’ distribution models and better documentation of the uncertainty associated with these models. An improved understanding of causes of species’ distributions, especially at their range limits, as well as of ecological assembly rules and ecosystem functioning, is necessary if further progress is to be made. A better collaborative effort between theoretical and functional ecologists, ecological modellers and statisticians is required to reach these goals.

Spatiotemporal modelling of abundance from multiple data sources in an integrated spatial distribution model

Integrating counts from rigorous surveys and participatory science to better understand spatiotemporal variation in population processes

A spatial modeling framework for monitoring surveys with different sampling protocols with a case study for bird abundance in mid-Scandinavia

Integrating presence‐only and detection/non‐detection data to estimate distributions and expected abundance of difficult‐to‐monitor species on a landscape‐scale

Bayesian hierarchical space-time models to improve multispecies assessment by combining observations from disparate fish surveys

LEVERAGING CITIZEN SCIENCE TO ASSESS RICHNESS, DIVERSITY, AND ABUNDANCE IN ANT COMMUNITIES

Estimating animal utilization distributions from multiple data types: a joint spatio-temporal point process framework

A multispecies hierarchical model to integrate count and distance‐sampling data

Improved state-space models for inference about spatial and temporal variation in abundance from count data

Overcoming data gaps using integrated models to estimate migratory species' dynamics during cryptic periods of the annual cycle

Fitting individual‐based models of spatial population dynamics to long‐term monitoring data

Joint species distribution models with imperfect detection for high-dimensional spatial data

Capitalising on Opportunistic Data for Monitoring Species Relative Abundances

Balancing structural complexity with ecological insight in Spatio‐temporal species distribution models

Species distribution modelling with spatio-temporal nearest neighbour Gaussian processes

spAbundance: An R package for single‐species and multi‐species spatially explicit abundance models

Joint inference for telemetry and spatial survey data

A modeling approach to forecast local demographic trends in metapopulations

Movement-based models for abundance data

Improving distribution models of sparsely documented disease vectors by incorporating information on related species via joint modeling

Making better biogeographical predictions of species' distributions