Abstract:An in‐depth understanding of wild animal behaviour and movement has assumed prime importance in recent years in light of an urgent need to augment our forecasting, conservation and management capacities in the face of rapid environmental change. Since gathering data on wild animals in their natural habitats is often precluded by logistical difficulty, animal‐borne sensor systems that offer the possibility of continuously and remotely recording data as the animal goes about its daily life have been developed (Ropert‐Coudert & Wilson, 2005 ). Over the two decades since their first application to remote monitoring of animal behaviour (e.g. Sellers, Varley, & Waters, 1998 ), animal‐borne accelerometers have been employed to gain insights into the life histories of species as far apart in size, type of habitat, speed and mode of locomotion as chipmunks ( Tamias alpinus ) (Hammond, Springthorpe, Walsh, & Berg‐Kirkpatrick, 2016 ), seals ( Leptonychotes weddellii ) (Naito, Bornemann, Takahashi, McIntyre, & Plötz, 2010 ), African wild dogs ( Lycaon pictus ) and cheetahs ( Acinonyx jubatus ) (Cozzi et al., 2012 ), vultures ( Gyps fulvus ) (Nathan et al., 2012 ) and blue whales ( Balaenoptera musculus ) (Goldbogen et al., 2011 ). To keep pace with the increasing ubiquity of accelerometry, developing methods applicable across species has become essential. For instance, general methods have been developed to infer animal energy expenditure from recorded acceleration (Wilson et al., 2006 ). However, despite progress in recognising animal behaviour from recorded acceleration, there is as yet no single technique that combines under one framework the virtues of easy‐to‐implement machine learning on the one hand, and the interpretability and robustness of biomechanically defined classification rules on the other. Machine learning, often rather unenviably referred to as a black box (e.g. McClune et al., 2014 ), has been widely employed to infer animal behaviour from raw acceleration data (Nathan et al., 2012 ; Grünewälder et al., 2012 ; Gao, Campbell, Bidder, & Hunter, 2013 ; Bidder et al., 2014 ; Resheff, Rotics, Harel, Spiegel, & Nathan, 2014 ; Wang et al., 2015 ). Despite the power and ease of use of machine learning approaches, the need to develop behaviour recognition tools generalisable across species has brought to light the importance of being able to physically interpret classification rules, even at the cost of small gains in classification accuracy (Nathan et al., 2012 ). Model interpretability becomes particularly significant when accurately recognising relatively rarer behaviours is important. When machine learning approaches are applied to datasets that are heavily skewed in the frequency and duration of different behaviours (Watanabe, Izawa, Kato, Ropert‐Coudert, & Naito, 2005 ; Grünewälder et al., 2012 ; Resheff et al., 2014 ; Wang et al., 2015 ), large overall accuracies may be obtained even when the recognition accuracy of under‐represented behaviours is poor (He & Garcia, 2009 ); the issue of imbalanced classes has even been called a 'curse' in machine learning literature (Lemaitre, Nogueira, & Aridas, 2017 ). This occurs because machine learning algorithms typically seek to minimise the overall misclassification rate, and thus tend to optimise for the most frequent behaviours since they contribute most to the overall accuracy—the classification performance of rare behaviours may nevertheless remain poor. Examination of the classification rules would help understand how to improve the recognition of rarer behaviours. However, the use of many features, which is typical with machine learning approaches (>15: Nathan et al., 2012 ; Resheff et al., 2014 ; Wang et al., <a href="#mee313172-bib-0028" -Abstract Truncated-

Machine Learning for Inferring Animal Behavior from Location and Movement Data

Machine learning for modeling animal movement

DeepBhvTracking: A Novel Behavior Tracking Method for Laboratory Animals Based on Deep Learning

The use of an unsupervised learning approach for characterizing latent behaviors in accelerometer data

109 Animal Behavior Analysis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning Techniques

Learning and Animal Movement

A hierarchical machine learning framework for the analysis of large scale animal movement data

Stochastic modelling of animal movement

Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies

Exploring deep learning techniques for wild animal behaviour classification using animal‐borne accelerometers

Machine Learning Models for Behavioural Diversity of Asian Elephants Prediction Using Satellite Collar Data

Development of a Novel Classification Approach for Cow Behavior Analysis Using Tracking Data and Unsupervised Machine Learning Techniques

A novel biomechanical approach for animal behaviour recognition using accelerometers

Machine learned daily life history classification using low frequency tracking data and automated modelling pipelines: application to North American waterfowl

Flexible discrete space models of animal movement

Basis Function Models for Animal Movement

Accounting for phenology in the analysis of animal movement

What is the animal doing? Tools for exploring behavioural structure in animal movements

Machine Learning in Modeling of Mouse Behavior

Multi-scale modeling of animal movement and general behavior data using hidden Markov models with hierarchical structures

Unsupervised Learning for Human Mobility Behaviors