Abstract:Current trends suggest that significant gender disparities exist within Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education at university, with female students being underrepresented in physics, but more equally represented in life sciences (e.g., biology, medicine). To understand these trends, it is important to consider the context in which students make decisions about which university courses to enrol in. The current study seeks to investigate gender differences in STEM through a unique approach that combines network analysis of student enrollment data with an interpretive lens based on the sociological theory of Pierre Bourdieu. We generate a network of courses taken by around 9000 undergraduate physics students (from 2009 to 2014) to quantify Bourdieu's concept of field. We identify the fields in which physics students participate by constructing a weighted co-enrollment network and finding communities within it. We then use odds ratios to report gender differences in transverse movements between different academic fields, and non-parametric tests to assess gender differences in vertical movements (changes in students' achievement rankings within a field). Odds ratios comparing the likelihood of progression from one field to another indicate that female students were more likely to make transverse movements into life science fields. We also found that university physics did a poor job in attracting high achieving students, and especially high achieving female students. Of the students who did choose to study physics at university, low and middle achieving female high school students were more likely to decrease their relative rank in their first year compared to their male counterparts. Low achieving female students were also less likely to continue with physics after their first year compared to their male counterparts. Results and implications are discussed in the context of Bourdieu's theory, and previous research. We argue that in order to remove constraints on female students' study choices, the field of physics needs to provide a culture in which all students feel like they belong.

Revealing shifts from mastery of knowledge to problem solving in assessments of a tertiary physics programme

Re-visioning the postgraduate preparation of theoretical physicists: An autoethnographic account using the Specialisation dimension of Legitimation Code Theory

Facilitating Problem Solving in a University Undergraduate Physics Classroom: The Case of Students’ Self-Efficacy

Assessing Scientific Practices in Physics Paper-based Assessments

Student epistemological framing on paper-based assessments

Physics graduate teaching assistants' beliefs about a grading rubric: Lessons learned

Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs

Impact of Context-Rich, Multifaceted Problems on Students' Attitudes Towards Problem-Solving

Theoretical exploration of task features that facilitate student sensemaking in physics

Student-Created Physics Problems as an Independent and Equitable Assessment Tool

Epistemic Impact on Group Problem Solving for Different Science Majors

Measuring changes in higher-order cognition through the assessment of complex knowledge over time

Surveying Graduate Students' Attitudes and Approaches to Problem Solving

What are we assessing? An analysis of the most common concept inventories in physics

Quantifying critical thinking: Development and validation of the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC)

Assessing Students' Misclassifications of Physics Concepts: An Ontological Basis for Conceptual Change

Einstein's contributions to quantum theory

Using disciplinary perspectives to refine conceptions of the "real world"

Students' views about the nature of experimental physics

Bourdieu, networks, and movements: Using the concepts of habitus, field and capital to understand a network analysis of gender differences in undergraduate physics

The challenges of changing teaching assistants' grading practices: Requiring students to show evidence of understanding