Abstract:Computational thinking in physics has many different forms, definitions, and implementations depending on the level of physics, or the institution it is presented in. In order to better integrate computational thinking in introductory physics, we need to understand what physicists find important about computational thinking in introductory physics. We present a qualitative analysis of twenty-six interviews asking academic (N=18) and industrial (N=8) physicists about the teaching and learning of computational thinking in introductory physics courses. These interviews are part of a longer-term project towards developing an assessment protocol for computational thinking in introductory physics. We find that academic and industrial physicists value students' ability to read code and that Python (or VPython) and spreadsheets were the preferred computational language or environment used. Additionally, the interviewees mentioned that identifying the core physics concepts within a program, explaining code to others, and good program hygiene (i.e., commenting and using meaningful variable names) are important skills for introductory students to acquire. We also find that while a handful of interviewees note that the experience and skills gained from computation are quite useful for student's future careers, they also describe multiple limiting factors of teaching computation in introductory physics, such as curricular overhaul, not having "space" for computation, and student rejection. The interviews show that while adding computational thinking to physics students repertoire is important, the importance really comes from using computational thinking to learn and understand physics better. This informs us that the assessment we develop should only include the basics of computational thinking needed to assess introductory physics knowledge.

Quantifying critical thinking: Development and validation of the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC)

Assessment of critical thinking in physics labs

Interview validation of the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC)

The Physics Inventory of Quantitative Literacy: A tool for assessing mathematical reasoning in introductory physics

Developing a reasoning inventory for measuring physics quantitative literacy

Using psychometric tools as a window into students' quantitative reasoning in introductory physics

Toolboxes and handing students a hammer: The effects of cueing and instruction on getting students to think critically

The development of physics learning tools to improve critical thinking skills

Critical Thinking Development for 21st Century: Analysis of Physics Curriculum

Critical thinking development in physics courses by PBL in virtual collaboration environments

Towards a Generalized Assessment of Computational Thinking for Introductory Physics Students

What are we assessing? An analysis of the most common concept inventories in physics

A framework for assessing computational thinking skills in the physics classroom: study on cognitive test development

A Comprehensive Assessment Strategy for Physics Laboratory Courses

Survey of physics reasoning on uncertainty concepts in experiments: an assessment of measurement uncertainty for introductory physics labs

Development of Waves Critical Thinking Test: Physics Essay Test for High School Student

Assessing Scientific Practices in Physics Paper-based Assessments

Using hot lab to increase pre-service physics teacher’s critical thinking skills related to the topic of RLC circuit

What counts in laboratories: toward a practice-based identity survey

Quantitative Comparisons to Promote Inquiry in the Introductory Physics Lab

A Novel Approach to Encourage Students Independent Thinking in the Physics Laboratory