Abstract:As an important method of propagating and distributing product information,word-of-mouth significantly influences consumers' purchase decisions and has attracted tremendous research interests from academia.Since the 1960s,researchers have gradually reached some consensus on the motivation and influential factors of word-of-mouth.Moreover,the related empirical studies have achieved rich results as well.However,relatively few researchers have studied this topic by developing analytical models.Consumers' prior expectation on the product quality is usually assumed to be given in the literature.Very few papers assume it to be the firm's controllable variable or consider the influence of discrepancy between the prior expectation and the actual performance on word-of-mouth.Based on the previous studies,this paper converts consumers' expected quality into products' advertised quality,which can be directly controlled by advertising or indirectly influenced by word-of-mouth.In addition,we consider the discrepancy between the prior expectation and the actual performance.Sensitive to this discrepancy and the level of discrepancy sensitivity are introduced into our model as two significant exogenous variables.We build a two-stage model and obtain the advertised optimal quality and pricing strategy.Influences of ad cost,and discrepancy between the prior expectation and the actual performance on the optimal strategies and profits are also discussed.Numerical analysis is conducted to further explore our findings.Results showed that the proportion of consumers who are sensitive to discrepancy and the level of discrepancy sensitivity has strong influence on firm's optimal strategies.When the ad cost is medium,the firm will choose a low ad intensity (i.e.the advertised quality is lower than the actual quality) if the proportion of consumers who are sensitive to discrepancy is large enough.Otherwise,it will choose a high ad'intensity (i.e.the advertised quality is smaller than the true quality).The higher the actual quality is,the more this firm is inclined to invest in the low ad intensity if the proportion of consumers who are sensitive to discrepancy is small enough.When the ad cost medium,the low ad intensity will be the firm's optimal strategy,and the ad intensity will increase with the level of discrepancy sensitivity.When the ad cost is not that high,the more sensitive to discrepancy consumers is,the more inclined the company is to invest in the highest ad intensity.

Is More Precise Word of Mouth Better for a High Quality Firm? ... Not Always

When Online Reviews Meet Sales Volume Information: is More or Accurate Information Always Better?

When Online Reviews Meet Sales Volume Information: Does More/Accurate Information Always is Always Beneficial?

To be precise (imprecise) in utilitarian (hedonic) contexts: Examining the influence of numerical precision on consumer reactions to artificial intelligence‐based recommendations

Influence of disconfirmation and word-of-mouth on advertising strategy

Does better information lead to lower prices ? Price and Advertising Signaling under External Information about Product Quality

Quality Signaling under External Information

Truly Costly Search and Word-of-Mouth Communication

Market Share Indicates Quality

Overprecise Forecasts

Better is Better? Signaling Paradoxes in Performance-Based Advertising

Price competition with uncertain quality and cost

Persuasion with costly precision

Impact of Online Information on the Pricing and Profits of Firms with Different Levels of Brand Reputation

Advertising Information, Advertising Precision and Resale Price Maintenance

High Price Strategy and Quality Signalling

The Advance and Spot Selling Strategy Under Quality Information Asymmetry

Information disclosure quality: correlation versus precision

Promoting a reputation for quality

Limited individual attention and online virality of low-quality information

Underpricing Luxury: When a Lower Price Results in Higher Reputation