Abstract:Problem definition: This paper studies an entrepreneur’s pricing strategy in a reward-based crowdfunding campaign under asymmetric product quality information. We propose two signaling mechanisms and investigate how entrepreneurs can leverage their pricing strategy to signal a high-quality project. Academic/practical relevance: This problem is relevant to practice, as asymmetric quality information is a significant concern in reward-based crowdfunding. High-quality entrepreneurs seek credible mechanisms to signal the quality of projects to customers. Methodology: We develop a stylized game-theoretic signaling model with funding and regular selling periods that captures asymmetric quality information between an entrepreneur and customers. Results: We propose a new theory on quality signaling in crowdfunding. We show that contingent access to the regular selling market after running a successful crowdfunding campaign allows high-quality entrepreneurs to signal their quality through low funding prices (one-price signaling). A high-quality entrepreneur can increase his funding price and still signal his high-quality level if he commits to the future regular selling price (two-price signaling). We show that the distinct feature of crowdfunding, that is, the probabilistic nature of crowdfunding, plays different roles in one- and two-price signaling. It is the driving force for the separating equilibrium in one-price signaling, and in two-price signaling, it affects how the entrepreneur should manipulate his funding and regular selling prices to reduce signaling cost. Managerial implications: Entrepreneurs should be mindful of pricing in funding and regular selling periods because it could play an essential role in signaling quality information. Our findings suggest practical tools for quality signaling in crowdfunding. We also investigate when price commitment is the most beneficial for a high-quality entrepreneur, looking for potential signaling mechanisms. Funding: W. Zhou acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72192823 and Grant 71821002]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1177 .

Promoting a reputation for quality

Underpricing Luxury: When a Lower Price Results in Higher Reputation

Reputation Tournaments in Differentiated Product Markets

Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing

Social Media Marketing, Quality Signaling, and the Goldilocks Principle

Optimal Depth and Timing of Price Promotions in a Vertically Differentiated Product Line

Impact of Online Information on the Pricing and Profits of Firms with Different Levels of Brand Reputation

Inducing Consumer Online Reviews Via Disclosure

Reputational Concern with Endogenous Information Acquisition

A Theoretical Analysis of Lack of Reputation among Chinese Firms

When Reputation Meets Subsidy: How to Build High Quality on Demand Service Platforms

Strategic disclosure with reputational concerns

Promoting a product without increasing the promotion budget: How chance in promotions can heighten consumer demand

Quality Signaling under External Information

Do Reputable Certifiers of Quality Exploit Their Reputations? Evidence from China’s IPO Market

Quality Disclosure Under Consumer Loss Aversion

A Reputation for Honesty

The Kind of Silence: Managing a Reputation for Voluntary Disclosure in Financial Markets

Pricing and investment in manufacturing and logistics when environmental reputation matters

Reputation and Pricing Dynamics in Online Markets

Reward-Based Crowdfunding: The Role of Information Disclosure