Abstract:Background: To investigate the interactions between RNA and proteins is essential to understand how these macromolecule complexes exert their functions. RNA pull-down is a classic technique to enrich RNA binding proteins, however, a large number of non-specific binding proteins may be enriched during sample preparation, interfering with the downstream mass spectrometric analyses and also causing false positives. Objective: In this study we examined the background contaminates in RNA pull-down experiment using mass spectrometric analysis. Method Antisense MALAT1 was first synthesized using in vitro transcription and incubated with cellular proteins extracted from HepG2 cells. The non-specific binding proteins were isolated using streptavidin conjugated magnetic beads and separated on SDS-PAGE. Each gel lane was divided into nine bands and digested with trypsin for the downstream LC-MS/MS analyses. Methods: Antisense MALAT1 was first synthesized using in vitro transcription and incubated with cellular proteins extracted from HepG2 cells. The non-specific binding proteins were isolated using streptavidin conjugated magnetic beads and separated on SDS-PAGE. Each gel lane was divided into nine bands and digested with trypsin for the downstream LC-MS/MS analyses. Results: 191 protein groups were identified as non-specific binding proteins in RNA pull-down samples. In addition, a comparison between different sample preparation conditions showed that the level of background contaminates was mostly induced by the solid phase support rather than the studied RNA. In addition, using more stringent detergent and streptavidin magnetic beads with smaller size could reduce the amount of background interfering proteins. Conclusion: This study provides a reference to distinguish bona fide RNA interacting proteins from the background contaminants. The results also demonstrate that different sample preparation conditions have great impacts on the level of enriched background contaminates, shedding new light on the optimization of RNA pull-down experiments.

Failing to account for RNA quantity inflates background and leads to the misleading appearance that PRC2 and GFP bind to RNA in vivo

Denaturing purifications demonstrate that PRC2 and other widely reported chromatin proteins do not appear to bind directly to RNA in vivo

The apparent loss of PRC2 chromatin occupancy as an artefact of RNA depletion

Re-analysis of CLAP data affirms PRC2 as an RNA binding protein

PRC2-RNA interactions: Viewpoint from Jimmy K. Guo, Mario R. Blanco, and Mitchell Guttman

The apparent loss of PRC2 chromatin occupancy as an artifact of RNA depletion

Evaluation of the RNA-dependence of PRC2 binding to chromatin in human pluripotent stem cells

Apparent RNA bridging between PRC2 and chromatin is an artifact of non-specific chromatin precipitation upon RNA degradation

Critical view on oligo(dT)-based RNA-seq: bias arising, modeling, and mitigating

Differences in molecular sampling and data processing explain variation among single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq experiments

Diverse RNA Structures Induce PRC2 Dimerization and Inhibit Histone Methyltransferase Activity

mRNA enrichment protocols determine the quantification characteristics of external RNA spike-in controls in RNA-Seq studies

Interrogating the Presence of RNA Phosphorothioate in Nature by a Highly Selective and Sensitive Fluorescence Method.

Analysis of the Non-Specific Binding Proteins in the RNA Pull-Down Experiment

An RNA tagging approach for system-wide RNA-binding proteome profiling and dynamics investigation upon transcription inhibition

Correction to Study of RNA Polymerase II Clustering Inside Live-Cell Nuclei Using Bayesian Nanoscopy.

Influence of RNA extraction methods and library selection schemes on RNA-seq data

Genes Expressed at Low Levels Raise False Discovery Rates in RNA Samples Contaminated with Genomic DNA

Statistical Issues in Binding Site Identification Through Clip-Seq

De Novo Prediction of PTBP1 Binding and Splicing Targets Reveals Unexpected Features of Its RNA Recognition and Function

Protocol dependence of sequencing-based gene expression measurements