Abstract:The field of human genetics has reached a consensus that it is important to work with diverse and globally representative participant groups. This diverse sampling is required to build a robust understanding of the genomic basis of complex traits and diseases as well as human evolution, and to ensure that all people benefit from downstream scientific discoveries. While previous work has characterized compositional biases and disparities for public genome-wide association (GWAS), microbiome, and epigenomic studies, we currently lack a comprehensive understanding of the degree of bias for transcriptomic studies. To address this gap, we analyzed the metadata for RNA-seq studies from two public databases-the Sequence Read Archive (SRA), representing 795,071 samples from 21,209 studies, and the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP), representing 167,389 samples from 649 studies. We also randomly selected 620 studies from SRA for detailed, manual evaluation. We found that 3% of samples in SRA and 21% of individuals described in the literature had population descriptors (race, ethnicity, or ancestry); 28% of samples in dbGaP had paired genotype data that was used to empirically infer ancestry. In SRA, dbGaP, and the literature, race, ethnicity, and ancestry terms were frequently conflated and difficult to disambiguate. After standardizing population descriptors, we observed many clear biases: for example, among samples in SRA that were coded using US Census terms, 69.0% came from white donors, corresponding to an 1.2x overrepresentation of this group relative to the US population. Among samples in SRA coded using continental ancestry labels, 55.6% came from European ancestry donors-an 4.1x overrepresentation of this group relative to the global population. These biases were generally similar across datasets (SRA, dbGaP, literature review), and were comparable to previous reports for other 'omics data types. However, we note that, relative to other 'omics data subsets like GWAS, there is considerably less information, of arguably worse quality, about who is participating in RNA-seq studies. Together, these results demonstrate a critical need to improve our thoughtfulness, consistency, and effort around reporting population descriptors in RNA-seq studies, and to more generally strive for greater diversity in this important data type.

Critical view on oligo(dT)-based RNA-seq: bias arising, modeling, and mitigating

Enhancing RNA-seq bias mitigation with the Gaussian self-benchmarking framework: towards unbiased sequencing data

IVT-seq reveals extreme bias in RNA sequencing

A Bias-Reducing Strategy in Profiling Small RNAs Using Solexa.

Enhancing RNA-seq analysis by addressing all co-existing biases using a self-benchmarking approach with 2D structural insights

Improved TGIRT-seq Methods for Comprehensive Transcriptome Profiling with Decreased Adapter Dimer Formation and Bias Correction

scCensus: Off-target scRNA-seq reads reveal meaningful biology

The impact of RNA secondary structure on read start locations on the Illumina sequencing platform

Gene length and detection bias in single cell RNA sequencing protocols

Differences in molecular sampling and data processing explain variation among single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq experiments

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Alignment Software for Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing Data

Failing to account for RNA quantity inflates background and leads to the misleading appearance that PRC2 and GFP bind to RNA in vivo

Correcting 4sU induced quantification bias in nucleotide conversion RNA-seq data

Improved precision, sensitivity, and adaptability of Ordered Two-Template Relay cDNA library preparation for RNA sequencing

Public RNA-seq data are not representative of global human diversity

A low-bias and sensitive small RNA library preparation method using randomized splint ligation

CLT-seq as a universal homopolymer-sequencing concept reveals poly(A)-tail-tuned ncRNA regulation

mRNA enrichment protocols determine the quantification characteristics of external RNA spike-in controls in RNA-Seq studies

Artifacts and biases of the reverse transcription reaction in RNA sequencing

Modeling and analysis of RNA-seq data: a review from a statistical perspective

Experimental and Computational Methods for Allelic Imbalance Analysis from Single-Nucleus RNA-seq Data