Prism Adaptation-Induced Modulation of Cortical Excitability of Upper and Lower Limb Muscles is Enhanced with Electrical Stimulation

Fisayo K Aloba,Jasmine M Hope,Jacob Spencer,Maithri Muthukumar,Taylor M Leone,Vyoma Parikh,Peii Chen,Michael R Borich,Trisha M Kesar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.30.24314639
2024-10-01
Abstract:Background: Prism adaptation (PA) is a behavioral training paradigm shown to induce immediate changes in visuospatial and motor function. PA may modulate the input and output stages of processing spatial cognitive information. However, the cortical plasticity mechanisms related to the behavioral effects of PA are poorly understood. Non-invasive sensorimotor electrical stimulation (Stim) may upregulate corticomotor excitability and is commonly used as a therapeutic adjunct during motor training. Objective: To evaluate the effects of combining PA with Stim on corticomotor excitability and visuo-spatial-motor behavior. Methods: We used a repeated-measures design to evaluate the effects of 1 session of PA with and without Stim in 15 young able-bodied individuals (18-35 years). Corticomotor output, intracortical inhibition, and facilitation were evaluated before and after PA with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited from single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to M1 hotspots of bilateral upper and left lower limbs. Results: Behaviorally, both PA+Stim and PA+Sham showed significant sensorimotor aftereffects (visuo-spatial and proprioceptive pointing). Neurophysiologically, suprathreshold MEP amplitude increased in the left first dorsal interossei, left tibialis anterior, and left soleus following the PA+Stim condition compared to the PA+Sham condition. Additionally, following PA+Stim, Short Interval Intra-Cortical Inhibition (SICI) increased in the left tibialis anterior and left soleus. Conclusion: Although both PA+Stim and PA+Sham had similar behavioral aftereffects, only PA+Stim increased cortical excitability in M1 representations of the left upper and lower limb (toward the direction of the PA aftereffect), suggesting that PA+Stim may elicit greater neurophysiological changes than PA alone. Keywords: visuomotor adaptation; sensorimotor adaptation; non-invasive brain stimulation; young adults; neuroplasticity; electrical stimulation.
Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the effects of prism adaptation (PA) combined with electrical stimulation (Stim) on cortical excitability and visuospatial - motor behavior. Specifically, the researchers hope to understand: 1. Whether **PA combined with electrical stimulation** can enhance cortical excitability more effectively than using PA alone. 2. Whether **PA combined with electrical stimulation** can produce greater neurophysiological changes, especially in the representation areas of upper and lower limb muscles in the primary motor cortex (M1). 3. Whether **PA combined with electrical stimulation** can produce visuospatial - motor after - effects similar to those of PA alone behaviorally (such as leftward shift in the visual - proprioceptive pointing task and the line bisection task). ### Research Background Prism adaptation (PA) is a behavioral training paradigm that can immediately change visuospatial and motor functions. PA may affect the input and output stages of spatial cognitive information processing. However, the cortical plasticity mechanisms related to the behavioral effects of PA are still unclear. Non - invasive sensorimotor electrical stimulation (Stim) can increase cortical motor excitability and is often used as an adjunct therapy for motor training. ### Research Purpose This paper aims to evaluate the effects of combining PA and electrical stimulation (PA + Stim) on cortical motor excitability and visuospatial - motor behavior. By comparing the effects of PA + Stim and PA + sham stimulation (PA + Sham), the researchers hope to reveal whether PA combined with electrical stimulation can produce greater neurophysiological changes. ### Methods The study adopts a repeated - measures design to evaluate the effects of combining or not combining electrical stimulation in one PA training session for 15 young and healthy individuals. The main measurement indicators include: - **Cortical motor output**: Evaluated by motor - evoked potentials (MEP) induced by single - pulse and paired - pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). - **Intracortical inhibition and facilitation**: Evaluated by short - interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), long - interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF). - **Behavioral indicators**: Evaluated by the visual - proprioceptive pointing task and the line bisection task. ### Results - **Behavioral results**: Both PA + Stim and PA + Sham significantly produced visuospatial - motor after - effects, but there was no significant difference in their behavioral effects. - **Neurophysiological results**: Under the PA + Stim condition, the suprathreshold MEP amplitudes of the left first dorsal interosseous muscle, the left tibialis anterior muscle and the left gastrocnemius muscle increased significantly, while there was no significant change under the PA + Sham condition. In addition, PA + Stim also increased the SICI of the left tibialis anterior muscle and the left gastrocnemius muscle. ### Conclusions Although PA + Stim and PA + Sham produced similar after - effects behaviorally, only PA + Stim significantly increased the cortical excitability of the left upper and lower limb muscles in the primary motor cortex, indicating that PA + Stim may cause greater neurophysiological changes. This provides a theoretical basis for future clinical treatments combining PA and electrical stimulation.