Timing‐dependent synergies between motor cortex and posterior spinal stimulation in humans
James R. McIntosh,Evan F. Joiner,Jacob L. Goldberg,Phoebe Greenwald,Alexandra C. Dionne,Lynda M. Murray,Earl Thuet,Oleg Modik,Evgeny Shelkov,Joseph M. Lombardi,Zeeshan M. Sardar,Ronald A. Lehman,Andrew K. Chan,K. Daniel Riew,Noam Y. Harel,Michael S. Virk,Christopher Mandigo,Jason B. Carmel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jp286183
2024-05-19
The Journal of Physiology
Abstract:figure legend Brain stimulation using transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) was paired with either posterior epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS; top) or anterior SCS (bottom). Middle: tES with posterior SCS produced a large facilitation over the tES‐only response; no such facilitation was observed with anterior SCS. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) shown for individual participant examples of brain‐only (light) and pairing motor evoked potentials (dark). Right: facilitation with posterior SCS was highly dependent on the interstimulus interval; optimal timing occurred when tES and SCS converged in the cervical spinal cord. Volitional movement requires descending input from the motor cortex and sensory feedback through the spinal cord. We previously developed a paired brain and spinal electrical stimulation approach in rats that relies on convergence of the descending motor and spinal sensory stimuli in the cervical cord. This approach strengthened sensorimotor circuits and improved volitional movement through associative plasticity. In humans, it is not known whether posterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted at the sensorimotor interface or anterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted within the motor system is effective at facilitating brain evoked responses. In 59 individuals undergoing elective cervical spine decompression surgery, the motor cortex was stimulated with scalp electrodes and the spinal cord was stimulated with epidural electrodes, with muscle responses being recorded in arm and leg muscles. Spinal electrodes were placed either posteriorly or anteriorly, and the interval between cortex and spinal cord stimulation was varied. Pairing stimulation between the motor cortex and spinal sensory (posterior) but not spinal motor (anterior) stimulation produced motor evoked potentials that were over five times larger than brain stimulation alone. This strong augmentation occurred only when descending motor and spinal afferent stimuli were timed to converge in the spinal cord. Paired stimulation also increased the selectivity of muscle responses relative to unpaired brain or spinal cord stimulation. Finally, clinical signs suggest that facilitation was observed in both injured and uninjured segments of the spinal cord. The large effect size of this paired stimulation makes it a promising candidate for therapeutic neuromodulation. Key points Pairs of stimuli designed to alter nervous system function typically target the motor system, or one targets the sensory system and the other targets the motor system for convergence in cortex. In humans undergoing clinically indicated surgery, we tested paired brain and spinal cord stimulation that we developed in rats aiming to target sensorimotor convergence in the cervical cord. Arm and hand muscle responses to paired sensorimotor stimulation were more than five times larger than brain or spinal cord stimulation alone when applied to the posterior but not anterior spinal cord. Arm and hand muscle responses to paired stimulation were more selective for targeted muscles than the brain‐ or spinal‐only conditions, especially at latencies that produced the strongest effects of paired stimulation. Measures of clinical evidence of compression were only weakly related to the paired stimulation effect, suggesting that it could be applied as therapy in people affected by disorders of the central nervous system.
neurosciences,physiology