Abstract:figure legend Brain stimulation using transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) was paired with either posterior epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS; top) or anterior SCS (bottom). Middle: tES with posterior SCS produced a large facilitation over the tES‐only response; no such facilitation was observed with anterior SCS. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) shown for individual participant examples of brain‐only (light) and pairing motor evoked potentials (dark). Right: facilitation with posterior SCS was highly dependent on the interstimulus interval; optimal timing occurred when tES and SCS converged in the cervical spinal cord. Volitional movement requires descending input from the motor cortex and sensory feedback through the spinal cord. We previously developed a paired brain and spinal electrical stimulation approach in rats that relies on convergence of the descending motor and spinal sensory stimuli in the cervical cord. This approach strengthened sensorimotor circuits and improved volitional movement through associative plasticity. In humans, it is not known whether posterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted at the sensorimotor interface or anterior epidural spinal cord stimulation targeted within the motor system is effective at facilitating brain evoked responses. In 59 individuals undergoing elective cervical spine decompression surgery, the motor cortex was stimulated with scalp electrodes and the spinal cord was stimulated with epidural electrodes, with muscle responses being recorded in arm and leg muscles. Spinal electrodes were placed either posteriorly or anteriorly, and the interval between cortex and spinal cord stimulation was varied. Pairing stimulation between the motor cortex and spinal sensory (posterior) but not spinal motor (anterior) stimulation produced motor evoked potentials that were over five times larger than brain stimulation alone. This strong augmentation occurred only when descending motor and spinal afferent stimuli were timed to converge in the spinal cord. Paired stimulation also increased the selectivity of muscle responses relative to unpaired brain or spinal cord stimulation. Finally, clinical signs suggest that facilitation was observed in both injured and uninjured segments of the spinal cord. The large effect size of this paired stimulation makes it a promising candidate for therapeutic neuromodulation. Key points Pairs of stimuli designed to alter nervous system function typically target the motor system, or one targets the sensory system and the other targets the motor system for convergence in cortex. In humans undergoing clinically indicated surgery, we tested paired brain and spinal cord stimulation that we developed in rats aiming to target sensorimotor convergence in the cervical cord. Arm and hand muscle responses to paired sensorimotor stimulation were more than five times larger than brain or spinal cord stimulation alone when applied to the posterior but not anterior spinal cord. Arm and hand muscle responses to paired stimulation were more selective for targeted muscles than the brain‐ or spinal‐only conditions, especially at latencies that produced the strongest effects of paired stimulation. Measures of clinical evidence of compression were only weakly related to the paired stimulation effect, suggesting that it could be applied as therapy in people affected by disorders of the central nervous system.

Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation and transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases motor cortical plasticity in healthy humans

Investigating the Working Mechanism of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

The Immediate and Short-Term Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability

Corticospinal excitability enhancement with simultaneous transcranial near-infrared stimulation and anodal direct current stimulation of motor cortex

Synergistic effects of transcutaneous spinal stimulation and neuromuscular electrical stimulation on lower limb force production: Time to deliver

Increased Corticomuscular Coherence and Brain Activation Immediately After Short-Term Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.

Simulating tDCS electrode placement to stimulate both M1 and SMA enhances motor performance and modulates cortical excitability depending on current flow direction

Modulating Motor Cortex Plasticity via Cortical and Peripheral Somatosensory Stimulation

Simultaneous Stimulation Using Rtms and Tdcs Produces the Most Effective Modulation of Motor Cortical Excitability in Healthy Subjects: A Pilot Study

Transspinal Direct Current Electrical Stimulation Selectively Affects the Excitability of the Corticospinal System, Depending on the Intensity but Not Motor Skills

Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases corticospinal transmission and enhances voluntary motor output in humans

Transcranial burst electrical stimulation contributes to neuromodulatory effects in the rat motor cortex

Timing‐dependent synergies between motor cortex and posterior spinal stimulation in humans

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation at submaximal intensity combined with motor imagery increases corticospinal excitability

Motor Neuroplastic Effects of a Novel Paired Stimulation Technology in an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Animal Model

Performance in myoelectric pattern recognition improves with transcranial direct current stimulation

Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Motor Cortical Excitability During Motor Imagery

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Physical Training on the Excitability of the Motor Cortex, Physical Performance, and Motor Learning: A Systematic Review

Effects of paired stimulation with specific waveforms on cortical and spinal plasticity in subjects with a chronic spinal cord injury

Modulations in neural pathways excitability post transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation among individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

Effects of cervical transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on spinal excitability