Quantifying physical degradation alongside recording and stimulation performance of 980 intracortical microelectrodes chronically implanted in three humans for 956-2246 days

David Bjanes,Spencer Kellis,Robert Nickl,Brian Baker,Tyson Aflalo,Luke Bashford,Srinivas Chivukula,Mathew Fifer,Luke Osborn,Breanne Christie,Brock Wester,Pablo Celnik,Daniel Krammer,Kelsie Pejsa,Nathan Crone,William Andersen,Nader Pouratian,Brian Lee,Charles Liu,Francesco Tenore,Loren Rieth,Richard Andersen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.09.24313281
2024-09-10
Abstract:Motivation: The clinical success of brain-machine interfaces depends on overcoming both biological and material challenges to ensure a long-term stable connection for neural recording and stimulation. Therefore, there is a need to quantify any damage that microelectrodes sustain when they are chronically implanted in the human cortex. Methods: Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), we imaged 980 microelectrodes from Neuroport arrays chronically implanted in the cortex of three people with tetraplegia for 956-2246 days. We analyzed eleven multi-electrode arrays in total: eight arrays with platinum (Pt) electrode tips and three with sputtered iridium oxide tips (SIROF); one Pt array was left in sterile packaging, serving as a control. The arrays were implanted/explanted across three different clinical sites surgeries (Caltech/UCLA, Caltech/USC and APL/Johns Hopkins) in the anterior intraparietal area, Brodmanns area 5, motor cortex, and somatosensory cortex. Human experts rated the electron micrographs of electrodes with respect to five damage metrics: the loss of metal at the electrode tip, the amount of separation between the silicon shank and tip metal, tissue adherence or bio-material to the electrode, damage to the shank insulation and silicone shaft. These metrics were compared to functional outcomes (recording quality, noise, impedance and stimulation ability). Results: Despite higher levels of physical degradation, SIROF electrodes were twice as likely to record neural activity than Pt electrodes (measured by SNR), at the time of explant. Additionally, 1 kHz impedance (measured in vivo prior to explant) significantly correlated with all physical damage metrics, recording, and stimulation performance for SIROF electrodes (but not Pt), suggesting a reliable measurement of in vivo degradation. We observed a new degradation type, primarily occurring on stimulated electrodes (pockmarked vs cracked) electrodes; however, tip metalization damage was not significantly higher due to stimulation or amount of charge. Physical damage was centralized to specific regions of an array often with differences between outer and inner electrodes. This is consistent with degradation due to contact with the biologic milieu, influenced by variations in initial manufactured state. From our data, we hypothesize that erosion of the silicon shank often precedes damage to the tip metal, accelerating damage to the electrode / tissue interface. Conclusions: These findings link quantitative measurements, such as impedance, to the physical condition of the microelectrodes and their capacity to record and stimulate. These data could lead to improved manufacturing or novel electrode designs to improve long-term performance of BMIs making them are vitally important as multi-year clinical trials of BMIs are becoming more common.
Neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the stability and performance degradation of microelectrode arrays chronically implanted in the human cortex in terms of recording and stimulating neural activities. Specifically, the researchers hope to quantify the physical damage suffered by microelectrodes during long - term implantation and analyze how these damages affect the functional performance of the electrodes, such as signal recording quality, noise level, impedance, and stimulation ability. These issues are crucial for improving the clinical application value of brain - machine interface (BMI) devices. In particular, ensuring that these devices can work stably for a long time during years of clinical trials is a key challenge. ### Research Background and Motivation - **Clinical Needs**: The success of brain - machine interfaces depends on overcoming biological and material challenges to ensure long - term stable connections for neural recording and stimulation. - **Existing Challenges**: Microelectrodes implanted for a long time may gradually fail due to material aging, biological reactions (such as inflammation and scar tissue formation), and damage caused by mechanical movement. - **Research Objectives**: By quantifying the physical damage of microelectrodes and correlating it with functional performance, provide a basis for improving manufacturing processes and designing new types of electrodes. ### Method Summary - **Sample Selection**: The study used 980 microelectrodes from 11 multi - electrode arrays implanted in the cortices of three quadriplegic patients, with implantation times ranging from 956 days to 2246 days. - **Electrode Types**: Two types of electrode tip materials were used in the study: platinum (Pt) and sputtered iridium oxide film (SIROF). - **Imaging Technique**: Each electrode was imaged at high resolution using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to assess its physical damage. - **Damage Assessment**: Six experts scored the electrodes according to five damage indicators (metal loss, separation, insulation damage, silicon shank damage, and biomaterial attachment). - **Functional Assessment**: The functional performance of the electrodes was evaluated by measuring impedance, noise level, signal - to - noise ratio (SNR), and stimulation ability. ### Main Findings - **Relationship between Physical Damage and Functional Performance**: Although SIROF electrodes had a higher degree of physical damage, their ability to record neural activities was twice that of platinum electrodes (measured by SNR). - **Correlation between Impedance and Damage**: For SIROF electrodes, the impedance at 1 kHz was significantly correlated with all physical damage indicators, recording quality, and stimulation performance, while there was no such correlation for platinum electrodes. - **New Damage Type**: A new type of damage was observed, mainly occurring on stimulated electrodes ("pitted" vs "crack - like"), but this damage was not significantly higher than that of unstimulated electrodes. - **Distribution of Damage Areas**: Physical damage was concentrated in specific areas of the array, and there were usually differences between the lateral and medial electrodes. ### Conclusions - **Importance of Quantitative Indicators**: The research results show that quantitative indicators such as impedance can be correlated with the physical state of microelectrodes and their recording and stimulation abilities, which is of great significance for improving manufacturing processes and designing new types of electrodes. - **Future Directions**: These data are helpful for developing more stable microelectrodes and improving the long - term performance of brain - machine interface devices, especially during years of clinical trials. Through these studies, the authors hope to provide important scientific basis for the development of brain - machine interface technology and promote the further development of this field.