Abstract:Background: The increasing development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in medicine driven by researchers and entrepreneurs goes along with enormous expectations for medical care advancement. AI might change the clinical practice of physicians from almost all medical disciplines and in most areas of health care. While expectations for AI in medicine are high, practical implementations of AI for clinical practice are still scarce in Germany. Moreover, physicians' requirements and expectations of AI in medicine and their opinion on the usage of anonymized patient data for clinical and biomedical research have not been investigated widely in German university hospitals. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate physicians' requirements and expectations of AI in medicine and their opinion on the secondary usage of patient data for (bio)medical research (eg, for the development of machine learning algorithms) in university hospitals in Germany. Methods: A web-based survey was conducted addressing physicians of all medical disciplines in 8 German university hospitals. Answers were given using Likert scales and general demographic responses. Physicians were asked to participate locally via email in the respective hospitals. Results: The online survey was completed by 303 physicians (female: 121/303, 39.9%; male: 173/303, 57.1%; no response: 9/303, 3.0%) from a wide range of medical disciplines and work experience levels. Most respondents either had a positive (130/303, 42.9%) or a very positive attitude (82/303, 27.1%) towards AI in medicine. There was a significant association between the personal rating of AI in medicine and the self-reported technical affinity level (H4=48.3, P<.001). A vast majority of physicians expected the future of medicine to be a mix of human and artificial intelligence (273/303, 90.1%) but also requested a scientific evaluation before the routine implementation of AI-based systems (276/303, 91.1%). Physicians were most optimistic that AI applications would identify drug interactions (280/303, 92.4%) to improve patient care substantially but were quite reserved regarding AI-supported diagnosis of psychiatric diseases (62/303, 20.5%). Of the respondents, 82.5% (250/303) agreed that there should be open access to anonymized patient databases for medical and biomedical research. Conclusions: Physicians in stationary patient care in German university hospitals show a generally positive attitude towards using most AI applications in medicine. Along with this optimism comes several expectations and hopes that AI will assist physicians in clinical decision making. Especially in fields of medicine where huge amounts of data are processed (eg, imaging procedures in radiology and pathology) or data are collected continuously (eg, cardiology and intensive care medicine), physicians' expectations of AI to substantially improve future patient care are high. In the study, the greatest potential was seen in the application of AI for the identification of drug interactions, assumedly due to the rising complexity of drug administration to polymorbid, polypharmacy patients. However, for the practical usage of AI in health care, regulatory and organizational challenges still have to be mastered.

Multinational attitudes towards AI in healthcare and diagnostics among hospital patients

Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients

Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis

Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey

Patient Perspectives on AI for Mental Health Care: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Multinational Multi-Center Survey on the Medical and Dental Students' Perception

An integrative review on the acceptance of artificial intelligence among healthcare professionals in hospitals

Trust in and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Medicine: Mixed Methods Study

Public perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: ethical concerns and opportunities for patient-centered care

Patients' Perceptions Toward Human-Artificial Intelligence Interaction in Health Care: Experimental Study

The knowledge and perception of patients in Malta towards artificial intelligence in medical imaging

Patient attitudes toward the AI doctor

Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Radiologists, IT Specialists, and Industry

Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Care: Content Analysis of Social Media

Future Medical Artificial Intelligence Application Requirements and Expectations of Physicians in German University Hospitals: Web-Based Survey

Global cross-sectional student survey on AI in medical, dental, and veterinary education and practice at 192 faculties

Exploring perceptions of healthcare technologies enabled by artificial intelligence: an online, scenario-based survey

Is My Doctor Human? Acceptance of AI among Patients with Breast Cancer

Artificial intelligence (AI) acceptance in primary care during the coronavirus pandemic: What is the role of patients' gender, age and health awareness? A two-phase pilot study

Attitudes and perceptions of Chinese oncologists towards artificial intelligence in healthcare: a cross-sectional survey