Difficult airway management – a glass half empty

K. Greenland,M. Edwards,L. Beckmann,N. Hutton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06039.x

IF: 12.893

2009-09-01

Anaesthesia

Abstract:We endorse the recent editorial recommendations by Frerk and Lee [1]. The problems pertaining to difficult airway management frequently stem from the heterogeneity of airway device research method and the inconsistency in airway training. Our department has therefore attempted to set-up a ‘firewall’ against the onslaught of new airway devices from outside and at the same time consolidate our teaching programme of airway skills from within. What defines a ‘difficult airway’, ‘difficult laryngoscopy’, ‘difficult intubation’ and ‘difficult mask ventilation’ is frequently ill-defined in the literature [2] and inconsistent between individuals with the same level of anaesthetic experience [3]. Similar to Frerk and Lee we are concerned with the plethora of airway devices. It is our department’s approach not to accept any new device unless it is loaned for a period of evaluation (usually at least 4 weeks). This allows the device to be assessed over period of time with and without company representatives being present. During this period, anaesthetic staff with a difficult airway management portfolio assess the device in a number of clinical scenarios. These scenarios usually include morbidly obese patients, simulated manual in-line stabilisation of the neck and patients presenting for airway surveillance following neck irradiation for laryngeal carcinoma. One of the important aspects of this assessment is whether the device may be used with minimal training. This stage of the evaluation is subjective and focuses on the length of the device’s learning curve and whether frequent usage is required to maintain proficiency. Also the ability of staff to successfully trouble-shoot device problems is an important feature. If the device proves to be easy to use then it is recommended for further evaluation focusing on other issues such as cost, reliability and success rate. Our department aims for a limited number of devices to be introduced based on their user-friendliness and versatility within the scope of various difficult airway scenarios. There is a diminishing skill base amongst trainees due to reductions in working hours and the growing use of supraglottic devices as an alternative to tracheal intubation [4–6]. Training difficulties are compounded by the use of manikins which replicate a ‘normal’ airway. Some commercially available manikins may simulate some conditions such as tongue and pharyngeal swelling, limited neck movement and laryngospasm. However, there is an lack of manikins specifically designed to replicate some of the common causes of the difficult airway such as morbid obesity, short neck, prominent upper incisors or retrognathia. This is an issue we would like to see addressed with the help of the manikin manufacturers. Our department is instituting a priority list for airway teaching based on practical airway skills, with regular assessment and proficiency demonstration. This starts with simple mask ventilation, direct laryngoscopy (with the Macintosh blade), supraglottic airway insertion and emergency surgical airway for the new trainees. As the trainee progresses they are introduced to more advanced techniques in a step-wise process including the intubating laryngeal mask, fibreoptic bronchoscopy ⁄ Aintree catheter technique, awake and asleep fibreoptic bronchsocopy as well as the use of alternative laryngoscope blades (straight and McCoy). We have also introduced the following goals for our department. • Furthering difficult airway management through research and product assessment. • Providing a sound teaching curriculum based on a difficult airway diagnosis [7] followed by a clinically relevant algorithm using a limited number of user-friendly airway devices or manoeuvres. • Standarisation of all difficult airway trolleys both in the operating theatres and in off-site anaesthetic areas with a clear understanding of both the strengths and weaknesses of this equipment in various difficult airway scenarios [8, 9]. This action reflects an attempt by the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthesists, with support from the Airway Management Special Interest Group, to standardise difficult airway trolley equipment in this region.