Abstract:The National Cancer Institute has prioritized a focus on an inclusive and diverse workforce as an essential component to advancing the science and quality of cancer care. New requirements for cancer centers to intentionally demonstrate a commitment to inclusion have made understanding organizational climate critical. Organizational culture is an essential, necessary, but not sufficient, component to understanding how members of a hospital perceive their leadership, peers, and progress. This quality improvement project aims to share best practices and lessons learned from a climate survey conducted at an NCI-designated matrix and consortium cancer center. We engaged in a mixed methods improvement cycle to understand the universe of survey activities across not only the cancer center, but also our academic partners which house all faculty affiliated with the cancer center including cancer researchers located at two external universities within our catchment area. In partnership with experts, stakeholders, and leadership we developed, tested, and deployed an equity, diversity, and inclusion focused climate survey to N=2355 members over a period of 3 week in 2024. Recipients included trainees, staff, and faculty using multiple modalities including word of mouth, personalized emails, and targeted pop-ups around the cancer center that allowed for in person contact. In particular the pop-up was part of a "warm" campaign to ensure responses, we also posted flyers with a QR code across the hospital, and deployed reminders were shared via the hospitals weekly via electronic newsletter. More specifically, the pop-ups were tables that were announced on the day they were deployed so that participants could visit a different part of the hospital and complete the survey, receive merchandise, and sign up for additional drawings and incentives. We had an 18% response rate, slightly better rates among faculty and staff. We also found that participants were more likely to respond to invitations sent directly to their email, this was closely followed by QR codes. Pop-up visitors ranged from 50-100 persons per instance for the six throughout the 3-week survey period. We observed similar increases in our utilization of both emails and QR codes, however, personalized emails had a greater more immediate impact than the QR codes likely due to convenience. We found that multi-method approaches to targeting membership for surveys is essential in the present era of information overload. There were at least 2 other enterprise-wide surveys going to faculty and trainees that overlapped with our cancer center member faculty and trainees thus increasing their burden for fatigue. We learned that it was key to work with all survey leadership to minimize redundancy. We also plan to meet to discuss best practices and will be sharing information across silos to improve these efforts collectively, a major accomplishment resulting from our efforts. Citation Format: Melody K. Schiaffino, Van "Vannie" K. Nguyen, Xochitl Villanueva, Jonathan Phan, Jennifer Tillman, Yariela Freeman, Mateo Banegas. Best practices for surveying climate at a matrix and consortium comprehensive cancer center to promote inclusive excellence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl) nr C140.

Measuring Institutional Research Culture: An Analysis of Accepted Abstracts at the Academic Surgical Congress

Quantifying the scientific interest in surgical training and education: numerical evidence of a PubMed analysis

Changing the Culture: Increasing and Sustaining Anesthesiology Resident Physician Publication Rates

Increasing Neurosurgical Resident Research Productivity Through Cultural Shift: Choosing Carrots Over Sticks

Conversion Rate of Abstracts Presented at Plastic Surgery The Meeting From 2010 to 2019

Fate of Abstracts Presented at Annual Meetings of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons from 2015 to 2019

The fate of the abstract: presentation and publication characteristics of abstracts presented at the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Annual Scientific Meetings 2013-2020

A National Study on Training Innovation in US Medical Education

Understanding Biomedicai Research Collaborations Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study.

Five-year institutional bibliometric profiles for 103 US neurosurgical residency programs

Evaluating neurosurgical society award recipients: An analysis of awardee characteristics with respect to gender, race, education, geographic location, and neurosurgical society

Abstract C140: Best practices for surveying climate at a matrix and consortium comprehensive cancer center to promote inclusive excellence

Five-Year Institutional Bibliometric Profiles for 119 North American Neurosurgical Residency Programs: An Update

Publication patterns of posters and oral presentations at the Annual Meeting of the Joint AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section

Metrics for Success in a Surgical Innovation Fellowship

Factors Impacting Academic Productivity and Satisfaction of Surgeon-scientists

Research capacity and culture: a survey of Australian Orthopaedic Association members

Association Between Study Quality and Publication Rates of Medical Education Abstracts Presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting

An examination of the effect of open versus paywalled access publication on the disseminative impact and citation count of publications in intensive care medicine and anesthesia

Impact of a Structured Roadmap, Individual Accountability and Support, and Outcome Measurement on the Culture of Scholarship in a Residency Program

A Call to Action: A Specialty-Specific Course to Support the Next Generation of Clinician Scientists in Anesthesiology