Abstract:Fluctuating transcription factor (TF) networks are commonly assumed to be responsible for stochastic hematopoietic lineage choice. The PU.1 and Gata1 TF pair, driving granulocytic-monocytic (GM) versus megakaryocytic-erythroid (MegE) lineage choice, respectively, is the paradigmatic TF pair underlying this hypothesis. Lineage priming, reprogramming experiments, positive autoregulation and mutual cross-antagonism of PU.1 and Gata1 have led to the hypothesis that random ‘noisy' fluctuations in PU.1 and Gata1 expression will allow one factor ‘winning' over the other and thus to inducing lineage choice. However, this hypothesis is based on limited expression data. So far, TF expression mostly was measured at the mRNA level in discontinuous snapshot analysis. For a comprehensive understanding, quantification of protein levels before, during and after lineage choice would be required. We therefore developed novel knock-in mouse lines simultaneously expressing PU.1eYFP and Gata1mCHERRY fusion proteins from their endogenous genomic loci. FACS analysis of those phenotypically normal mice allows identification and prospective isolation of several new myeloid hematopoietic subpopulations. Long-term single cell tracking and the development of novel software tools enables us to estimate endogenous molecule numbers and to quantify TF expression kinetics and dynamics with high resolution. This approach provides the quantitative continuous data in living hematopoietic stem and progenitors cells required for testing the above mentioned hypothesis. It demonstrates that fluctuating PU.1 and Gata1 levels are not responsible for GM-MegE lineage decision making. Fluctuating transcription factor (TF) networks are commonly assumed to be responsible for stochastic hematopoietic lineage choice. The PU.1 and Gata1 TF pair, driving granulocytic-monocytic (GM) versus megakaryocytic-erythroid (MegE) lineage choice, respectively, is the paradigmatic TF pair underlying this hypothesis. Lineage priming, reprogramming experiments, positive autoregulation and mutual cross-antagonism of PU.1 and Gata1 have led to the hypothesis that random ‘noisy' fluctuations in PU.1 and Gata1 expression will allow one factor ‘winning' over the other and thus to inducing lineage choice. However, this hypothesis is based on limited expression data. So far, TF expression mostly was measured at the mRNA level in discontinuous snapshot analysis. For a comprehensive understanding, quantification of protein levels before, during and after lineage choice would be required. We therefore developed novel knock-in mouse lines simultaneously expressing PU.1eYFP and Gata1mCHERRY fusion proteins from their endogenous genomic loci. FACS analysis of those phenotypically normal mice allows identification and prospective isolation of several new myeloid hematopoietic subpopulations. Long-term single cell tracking and the development of novel software tools enables us to estimate endogenous molecule numbers and to quantify TF expression kinetics and dynamics with high resolution. This approach provides the quantitative continuous data in living hematopoietic stem and progenitors cells required for testing the above mentioned hypothesis. It demonstrates that fluctuating PU.1 and Gata1 levels are not responsible for GM-MegE lineage decision making.

Automated live-cell single-molecule tracking in enteroid monolayers reveals transcription factor dynamics probing lineage-determining function

Automated live-cell single-molecule tracking in enteroid monolayers reveals transcription factor dynamics probing lineage-determining function

Chromatin Potential Identified by Shared Single Cell Profiling of RNA and Chromatin

Dynamic RNA polymerase II occupancy drives differentiation of the intestine under the direction of HNF4

Quantitative classification of chromatin dynamics reveals regulators of intestinal stem cell differentiation

Discrete regulatory modules instruct hematopoietic lineage commitment and differentiation

Myeloid Lineage Choice is Not Controlled by the Pu.1-Gata1 Switch

Retrospective analysis of enhancer activity and transcriptome history

Diffusion Maps for High-Dimensional Single-Cell Analysis of Differentiation Data

A Proximal-to-Distal Survey of Healthy Adult Human Small Intestine and Colon Epithelium by Single-Cell Transcriptomics

Chromatin dynamics during hematopoiesis reveal discrete regulatory modules instructing differentiation

Local Chromatin Dynamics of Transcription Factors Imply Cell-Lineage Specific Functions During Cellular Differentiation.

Characterization of Transcriptional Networks in Blood Stem and Progenitor Cells Using High-Throughput Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis

Identification of Biomarkers Controlling Cell Fate In Blood Cell Development

Lineage tracing on transcriptional landscapes links state to fate during differentiation

Transcriptional Regulatory Logic Orchestrating Lymphoid and Myeloid Cell Fate Decisions

Temporal dynamics and transcriptional control using single-cell gene expression analysis

A MTA2-SATB2 chromatin complex restrains colonic plasticity toward small intestine by retaining HNF4A at colonic chromatin

Single-cell lineage tracing unveils a role for TCF15 in haematopoiesis

Harnessing spatial transcriptomics to study fate decisions and lineage specification in T cell development

Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Spatial and Temporal Turnover of Keratinocyte Differentiation Regulators