Myeloid Lineage Choice is Not Controlled by the Pu.1-Gata1 Switch

Philipp Hoppe,Michael Schwarzfischer,Claus Nerlov,Fabian Theis,Timm Schroeder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2013.05.270

IF: 3.249

2013-01-01

Experimental Hematology

Abstract:Fluctuating transcription factor (TF) networks are commonly assumed to be responsible for stochastic hematopoietic lineage choice. The PU.1 and Gata1 TF pair, driving granulocytic-monocytic (GM) versus megakaryocytic-erythroid (MegE) lineage choice, respectively, is the paradigmatic TF pair underlying this hypothesis. Lineage priming, reprogramming experiments, positive autoregulation and mutual cross-antagonism of PU.1 and Gata1 have led to the hypothesis that random ‘noisy' fluctuations in PU.1 and Gata1 expression will allow one factor ‘winning' over the other and thus to inducing lineage choice. However, this hypothesis is based on limited expression data. So far, TF expression mostly was measured at the mRNA level in discontinuous snapshot analysis. For a comprehensive understanding, quantification of protein levels before, during and after lineage choice would be required. We therefore developed novel knock-in mouse lines simultaneously expressing PU.1eYFP and Gata1mCHERRY fusion proteins from their endogenous genomic loci. FACS analysis of those phenotypically normal mice allows identification and prospective isolation of several new myeloid hematopoietic subpopulations. Long-term single cell tracking and the development of novel software tools enables us to estimate endogenous molecule numbers and to quantify TF expression kinetics and dynamics with high resolution. This approach provides the quantitative continuous data in living hematopoietic stem and progenitors cells required for testing the above mentioned hypothesis. It demonstrates that fluctuating PU.1 and Gata1 levels are not responsible for GM-MegE lineage decision making. Fluctuating transcription factor (TF) networks are commonly assumed to be responsible for stochastic hematopoietic lineage choice. The PU.1 and Gata1 TF pair, driving granulocytic-monocytic (GM) versus megakaryocytic-erythroid (MegE) lineage choice, respectively, is the paradigmatic TF pair underlying this hypothesis. Lineage priming, reprogramming experiments, positive autoregulation and mutual cross-antagonism of PU.1 and Gata1 have led to the hypothesis that random ‘noisy' fluctuations in PU.1 and Gata1 expression will allow one factor ‘winning' over the other and thus to inducing lineage choice. However, this hypothesis is based on limited expression data. So far, TF expression mostly was measured at the mRNA level in discontinuous snapshot analysis. For a comprehensive understanding, quantification of protein levels before, during and after lineage choice would be required. We therefore developed novel knock-in mouse lines simultaneously expressing PU.1eYFP and Gata1mCHERRY fusion proteins from their endogenous genomic loci. FACS analysis of those phenotypically normal mice allows identification and prospective isolation of several new myeloid hematopoietic subpopulations. Long-term single cell tracking and the development of novel software tools enables us to estimate endogenous molecule numbers and to quantify TF expression kinetics and dynamics with high resolution. This approach provides the quantitative continuous data in living hematopoietic stem and progenitors cells required for testing the above mentioned hypothesis. It demonstrates that fluctuating PU.1 and Gata1 levels are not responsible for GM-MegE lineage decision making.