Abstract:Fluctuating transcription factor (TF) networks are commonly assumed to be responsible for stochastic hematopoietic lineage choice. The PU.1 and Gata1 TF pair, driving granulocytic-monocytic (GM) versus megakaryocytic-erythroid (MegE) lineage choice, respectively, is the paradigmatic TF pair underlying this hypothesis. Lineage priming, reprogramming experiments, positive autoregulation and mutual cross-antagonism of PU.1 and Gata1 have led to the hypothesis that random ‘noisy' fluctuations in PU.1 and Gata1 expression will allow one factor ‘winning' over the other and thus to inducing lineage choice. However, this hypothesis is based on limited expression data. So far, TF expression mostly was measured at the mRNA level in discontinuous snapshot analysis. For a comprehensive understanding, quantification of protein levels before, during and after lineage choice would be required. We therefore developed novel knock-in mouse lines simultaneously expressing PU.1eYFP and Gata1mCHERRY fusion proteins from their endogenous genomic loci. FACS analysis of those phenotypically normal mice allows identification and prospective isolation of several new myeloid hematopoietic subpopulations. Long-term single cell tracking and the development of novel software tools enables us to estimate endogenous molecule numbers and to quantify TF expression kinetics and dynamics with high resolution. This approach provides the quantitative continuous data in living hematopoietic stem and progenitors cells required for testing the above mentioned hypothesis. It demonstrates that fluctuating PU.1 and Gata1 levels are not responsible for GM-MegE lineage decision making. Fluctuating transcription factor (TF) networks are commonly assumed to be responsible for stochastic hematopoietic lineage choice. The PU.1 and Gata1 TF pair, driving granulocytic-monocytic (GM) versus megakaryocytic-erythroid (MegE) lineage choice, respectively, is the paradigmatic TF pair underlying this hypothesis. Lineage priming, reprogramming experiments, positive autoregulation and mutual cross-antagonism of PU.1 and Gata1 have led to the hypothesis that random ‘noisy' fluctuations in PU.1 and Gata1 expression will allow one factor ‘winning' over the other and thus to inducing lineage choice. However, this hypothesis is based on limited expression data. So far, TF expression mostly was measured at the mRNA level in discontinuous snapshot analysis. For a comprehensive understanding, quantification of protein levels before, during and after lineage choice would be required. We therefore developed novel knock-in mouse lines simultaneously expressing PU.1eYFP and Gata1mCHERRY fusion proteins from their endogenous genomic loci. FACS analysis of those phenotypically normal mice allows identification and prospective isolation of several new myeloid hematopoietic subpopulations. Long-term single cell tracking and the development of novel software tools enables us to estimate endogenous molecule numbers and to quantify TF expression kinetics and dynamics with high resolution. This approach provides the quantitative continuous data in living hematopoietic stem and progenitors cells required for testing the above mentioned hypothesis. It demonstrates that fluctuating PU.1 and Gata1 levels are not responsible for GM-MegE lineage decision making.

Chromatin dynamics during hematopoiesis reveal discrete regulatory modules instructing differentiation

Discrete regulatory modules instruct hematopoietic lineage commitment and differentiation

Chromatin Potential Identified by Shared Single Cell Profiling of RNA and Chromatin

Characterization of Transcriptional Networks in Blood Stem and Progenitor Cells Using High-Throughput Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis

Dynamic Control of Enhancer Repertoires Drives Lineage and Stage-Specific Transcription During Hematopoiesis

Epigenetic regulatory differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells to the red lineage Running head: Epigenetics of erythropoiesis

Local Chromatin Dynamics of Transcription Factors Imply Cell-Lineage Specific Functions During Cellular Differentiation.

Pre-configuring chromatin architecture with histone modifications guides hematopoietic stem cell formation in mouse embryos

Transcriptional Regulatory Logic Orchestrating Lymphoid and Myeloid Cell Fate Decisions

Myeloid Lineage Choice is Not Controlled by the Pu.1-Gata1 Switch

Chromatin structure and 3D architecture define differential functions of cis regulatory elements in human blood cell lineages

Genome-wide transcription factor-binding maps reveal cell-specific changes in the regulatory architecture of human HSPCs

Transcriptional Regulatory Network Controlling the Ontogeny of Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Temporal mapping of gene expression levels during the differentiation of individual primary hematopoietic cells

Early Myeloid Lineage Choice is Not Initiated by Random PU.1 to GATA1 Protein Ratios

Dynamic Analysis of Gene Expression and Genome-Wide Transcription Factor Binding During Lineage Specification of Multipotent Progenitors.

Transcriptional Accessibility For Genes Of Multiple Tissues And Hematopoietic Lineages Is Hierarchically Controlled During Early Hematopoiesis

A Single-Cell Hematopoietic Landscape Resolves 8 Lineage Trajectories and Defects in Kit Mutant Mice.

Putative regulators for the continuum of erythroid differentiation revealed by single-cell transcriptome of human BM and UCB cells

Data-driven modeling predicts gene regulatory network dynamics during the differentiation of multipotential hematopoietic progenitors

Single Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Unanticipated Features of Early Hematopoietic Precursors.