Abstract:When animals learn the association of a conditioned stimulus (CS) with an unconditioned stimulus (US), later presentation of the CS invokes a representation of the US. When the expected US fails to occur, theoretical accounts predict that conditioned inhibition can accrue to any other stimuli that are associated with this change in the US. Empirical work with mammals has confirmed the existence of conditioned inhibition. But the way it is manifested, the conditions that produce it, and determining whether it is the opposite of excitatory conditioning are important considerations. Invertebrates can make valuable contributions to this literature because of the well-established conditioning protocols and access to the central nervous system (CNS) for studying neural underpinnings of behavior. Nevertheless, although conditioned inhibition has been reported, it has yet to be thoroughly investigated in invertebrates. Here, we evaluate the role of the US in producing conditioned inhibition by using proboscis extension response conditioning of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Specifically, using variations of a "feature-negative" experimental design, we use downshifts in US intensity relative to US intensity used during initial excitatory conditioning to show that an odorant in an odor–odor mixture can become a conditioned inhibitor. We argue that some alternative interpretations to conditioned inhibition are unlikely. However, we show variation across individuals in how strongly they show conditioned inhibition, with some individuals possibly revealing a different means of learning about changes in reinforcement. We discuss how the resolution of these differences is needed to fully understand whether and how conditioned inhibition is manifested in the honeybee, and whether it can be extended to investigate how it is encoded in the CNS. It is also important for extension to other insect models. In particular, work like this will be important as more is revealed of the complexity of the insect brain from connectome projects.

Reinforcement Expectation in the Honey Bee ( ): Can Downshifts in Reinforcement Show Conditioned Inhibition?

Reinforcement expectation in the honeybee ( Apis mellifera ): Can downshifts in reinforcement show conditioned inhibition?

Odor Discrimination after Olfactory Conditioning of Managed Solitary Bees, Osmia Lignaria and Megachile Rotundata

Latent inhibition in an insect: the role of aminergic signaling

Tyramine and its Amtyr1 receptor modulate attention in honey bees (Apis mellifera)

The sound and the fury--bees hiss when expecting danger

Length of stimulus presentation and visual angle are critical for efficient visual PER conditioning in the restrained honey bee, Apis mellifera

Analysis of fast calcium dynamics of honey bee olfactory coding

Failure to Find Ethanol-Induced Conditioned Taste Aversion in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.)

Smell and Aftersmell: Fast Calcium Imaging Dynamics of Honey Bee Olfactory Coding

Gene Expression and Functional Analyses of Odorant Receptors in Small Hive Beetles (aethina Tumida)

Honeybees learn odour mixtures via a selection of key odorants

Cognitive components of color vision in honey bees: how conditioning variables modulate color learning and discrimination

Extinction of innate floral preferences in the pollinator Eristalis tenax

Plasticity in inhibitory networks improves pattern separation in early olfactory processing

Individual consistency in the learning abilities of honey bees: cognitive specialization within sensory and reinforcement modalities

A computational model of conditioning inspired by Drosophila olfactory system

Salivary conditioning with antennal gustatory unconditioned stimulus in an insect

Degradation of an appetitive olfactory memory via devaluation of sugar reward is mediated by 5-HT signaling in the honey bee

Pheromone components affect motivation and induce persistent modulation of associative learning and memory in honey bees