Abstract:When animals learn the association of a conditioned stimulus (CS) with an unconditioned stimulus (US), later presentation of the CS invokes a representation of the US. When the expected US fails to occur, theoretical accounts predict that conditioned inhibition can accrue to any other stimuli that are associated with this change in the US. Empirical work with mammals has confirmed the existence of conditioned inhibition. But the way it is manifested, the conditions that produce it, and determining whether it is the opposite of excitatory conditioning are important considerations. Invertebrates can make valuable contributions to this literature because of the well-established conditioning protocols and access to the central nervous system (CNS) for studying neural underpinnings of behavior. Nevertheless, although conditioned inhibition has been reported, it has yet to be thoroughly investigated in invertebrates. Here, we evaluate the role of the US in producing conditioned inhibition by using proboscis extension response conditioning of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Specifically, using variations of a "feature-negative" experimental design, we use downshifts in US intensity relative to US intensity used during initial excitatory conditioning to show that an odorant in an odor–odor mixture can become a conditioned inhibitor. We argue that some alternative interpretations to conditioned inhibition are unlikely. However, we show variation across individuals in how strongly they show conditioned inhibition, with some individuals possibly revealing a different means of learning about changes in reinforcement. We discuss how the resolution of these differences is needed to fully understand whether and how conditioned inhibition is manifested in the honeybee, and whether it can be extended to investigate how it is encoded in the CNS. It is also important for extension to other insect models. In particular, work like this will be important as more is revealed of the complexity of the insect brain from connectome projects.

Honeybees learn odour mixtures via a selection of key odorants

Odor Discrimination after Olfactory Conditioning of Managed Solitary Bees, Osmia Lignaria and Megachile Rotundata

Selection of key floral scent compounds from fruit and vegetable crops by honey bees depends on sensory capacity and experience

Length of stimulus presentation and visual angle are critical for efficient visual PER conditioning in the restrained honey bee, Apis mellifera

Ability of honeybee, Apis mellifera, to detect and discriminate odors of varieties of canola (Brassica rapa and Brassica napus) and snapdragon flowers (Antirrhinum majus)

Pheromone components affect motivation and induce persistent modulation of associative learning and memory in honey bees

The sound and the fury--bees hiss when expecting danger

Smell and Aftersmell: Fast Calcium Imaging Dynamics of Honey Bee Olfactory Coding

Hyperbolic odorant mixtures as a basis for more efficient signaling between flowering plants and bees.

Plasticity in inhibitory networks improves pattern separation in early olfactory processing

Analysis of fast calcium dynamics of honey bee olfactory coding

Neural basis of a pollinator's buffet: olfactory specialization and learning in Manduca sexta

Differential odor processing in two olfactory pathways in the honeybee

Proteome analysis reveals a strong correlation between olfaction and pollen foraging preference in honeybees

Learning of a Mimic Odor within Beehives Improves Pollination Service Efficiency in a Commercial Crop

Behavioral and genetic correlates of heterogeneity in learning performance in individual honeybees, Apis mellifera

Behavioral state influences encoding mechanisms of color and odor integration in a model insect, the bumblebee Bombus impatiens

Reinforcement expectation in the honeybee ( Apis mellifera ): Can downshifts in reinforcement show conditioned inhibition?

Cognitive components of color vision in honey bees: how conditioning variables modulate color learning and discrimination

Bumblebees flexibly adjust learning and decision strategies to sensory information content in a foraging task