Abstract:The potential of getting a significant number of false positives (FPs) in peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) obtained by proteomic database search has been well-recognized. Among the attempts to assess FPs, the concomitant use of target and decoy databases is widely practiced. By adjusting filtering criteria, FPs and false discovery rate (FDR) can be controlled at a desired level. Although the target-decoy approach is gaining in popularity, subtle differences in decoy construction (e.g., reversing vs stochastic methods), rate calculation (e.g., total vs unique PSMs), or searching (separate vs composite) do exist among various implementations. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of these differences on FP and FDR estimations using a rat kidney protein sample and the SEQUEST search engine as an example. On the effects of decoy construction, we found that, when a single scoring filter (XCorr) was used, stochastic methods generated a higher estimation of FPs and FDR than sequence reversing methods, likely due to an increase in unique peptides. This higher estimation could largely be attenuated by creating decoy databases similar in effective size but not by a simple normalization with a unique-peptide coefficient. When multiple filters were applied, the differences seen between reversing and stochastic methods significantly diminished, suggesting multiple filterings reduce the dependency on how a decoy is constructed. For a fixed set of filtering criteria, FDR and FPs estimated by using unique PSMs were almost twice those using total PSMs. The higher estimation seemed to be dependent on data acquisition setup. As to the differences between performing separate or composite searches, in general, FDR estimated from the separate search was about three times that from the composite search. The degree of difference gradually decreased as the filtering criteria became more stringent. Paradoxically, the estimated true positives in separate search were higher when multiple filters were used. By analyzing a standard protein mixture, we demonstrated that the higher estimation of FDR and FPs in the separate search likely reflected an overestimation, which could be corrected with a simple merging procedure. Our study illustrates the relative merits of different implementations of the target-decoy strategy, which should be worth contemplating when large-scale proteomic biomarker discovery is to be attempted.

How to train a post-processor for tandem mass spectrometry proteomics database search while maintaining control of the false discovery rate

Reinvestigating the Correctness of Decoy-Based False Discovery Rate Control in Proteomics Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.

Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry

Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation Procedure for Shotgun Proteomics

A Three-Stage Search Strategy Combining Database Reduction and Retention Time Filtering to Improve the Sensitivity of Low-Input and Single-Cell Proteomic Analysis.

A Theoretical Foundation of the Target-Decoy Search Strategy for False Discovery Rate Control in Proteomics

An algorithm for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in XL-MS/MS proteomics

Multiple competition-based FDR control for peptide detection

Assessment of false discovery rate control in tandem mass spectrometry analysis using entrapment

Decoy-free Protein-Level False Discovery Rate Estimation

FineFDR: Fine-grained Taxonomy-specific False Discovery Rates Control in Metaproteomics

Tesorai Search: Large pretrained model boosts identifications in mass spectrometry proteomics without the need for Percolator.

New mixture models for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in mass-spectrometry proteomics

ProteinInferencer: Confident protein identification and multiple experiment comparison for large scale proteomics projects

Using the entrapment sequence method as a standard to evaluate key steps of proteomics data analysis process

Data processing of product ion spectra: Methods to control false discovery rate in compound search results for non-targeted metabolomics

Optimization of Search Engines and Postprocessing Approaches to Maximize Peptide and Protein Identification for High-Resolution Mass Data

Automatic validation of phosphopeptide identifications by the MS2/MS3 target-decoy search strategy.

Precursor deconvolution error estimation: The missing puzzle piece in false discovery rate in top‐down proteomics

Target-Decoy-Based False Discovery Rate Estimation for Large-Scale Metabolite Identification.