Abstract:The two key steps for analyzing proteomic data generated by high-resolution MS are database searching and postprocessing. While the two steps are interrelated, studies on their combinatory effects and the optimization of these procedures have not been adequately conducted. Here, we investigated the performance of three popular search engines (SEQUEST, Mascot, and MS Amanda) in conjunction with five filtering approaches, including respective score-based filtering, a group-based approach, local false discovery rate (LFDR), PeptideProphet, and Percolator. A total of eight data sets from various proteomes (e.g., E. coli, yeast, and human) produced by various instruments with high-accuracy survey scan (MS1) and high- or low-accuracy fragment ion scan (MS2) (LTQ-Orbitrap, Orbitrap-Velos, Orbitrap-Elite, Q-Exactive, Orbitrap-Fusion, and Q-TOF) were analyzed. It was found combinations involving Percolator achieved markedly more peptide and protein identifications at the same FDR level than the other 12 combinations for all data sets. Among these, combinations of SEQUEST-Percolator and MS Amanda-Percolator provided slightly better performances for data sets with low-accuracy MS2 (ion trap or IT) and high accuracy MS2 (Orbitrap or TOF), respectively, than did other methods. For approaches without Percolator, SEQUEST-group performs the best for data sets with MS2 produced by collision-induced dissociation (CID) and IT analysis; Mascot-LFDR gives more identifications for data sets generated by higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) and analyzed in Orbitrap (HCD-OT) and in Orbitrap Fusion (HCD-IT); MS Amanda-Group excels for the Q-TOF data set and the Orbitrap Velos HCD-OT data set. Therefore, if Percolator was not used, a specific combination should be applied for each type of data set. Moreover, a higher percentage of multiple-peptide proteins and lower variation of protein spectral counts were observed when analyzing technical replicates using Percolator-associated combinations; therefore, Percolator enhanced the reliability for both identification and quantification. The analyses were performed using the specific programs embedded in Proteome Discoverer, Scaffold, and an in-house algorithm (BuildSummary). These results provide valuable guidelines for the optimal interpretation of proteomic results and the development of fit-for-purpose protocols under different situations.

Tesorai Search: Large pretrained model boosts identifications in mass spectrometry proteomics without the need for Percolator.

AdaNovo: Adaptive De Novo Peptide Sequencing with Conditional Mutual Information

Test-Time Training for Deep MS/MS Spectrum Prediction Improves Peptide Identification.

How to train a post-processor for tandem mass spectrometry proteomics database search while maintaining control of the false discovery rate

Faster graphical model identification of tandem mass spectra using peptide word lattices

Spectral Prediction Features as a Solution for the Search Space Size Problem in Proteogenomics

Efficient online learning for large-scale peptide identification

Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry

Predicting peptide properties from mass spectrometry data using deep attention-based multitask network and uncertainty quantification

MS/MS Spectrum Prediction for Modified Peptides Using Pdeep2 Trained by Transfer Learning

PeaksDB: New Software for Substantially Improved Peptide Identification from Orbitrap ETD Mass Spectrometry

New mixture models for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in mass-spectrometry proteomics

Transformer-based de novo peptide sequencing for data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry

Optimization of Search Engines and Postprocessing Approaches to Maximize Peptide and Protein Identification for High-Resolution Mass Data

DDA-BERT: leveraging transformer architecture pre-training for data-dependent acquisition mass spectrometry-based proteomics

Dear-PSM: A deep learning-based peptide search engine enables full database search for proteomics

Emergence of molecular structures from repository-scale self-supervised learning on tandem mass spectra

ProPept-MT: A Multi-Task Learning Model for Peptide Feature Prediction

yHydra: Deep Learning enables an Ultra Fast Open Search by Jointly Embedding MS/MS Spectra and Peptides of Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics

Deep learning for peptide identification from metaproteomics datasets

DeepIso: A Deep Learning Model for Peptide Feature Detection