Magnetic domain engineering in antiferromagnetic and
Sonka Reimers,Olena Gomonay,Oliver J. Amin,Filip Krizek,Luke X. Barton,Yaryna Lytvynenko,Stuart F. Poole,Vit Novák,Richard P. Campion,Francesco Maccherozzi,Gerardina Carbone,Alexander Björling,Yuran Niu,Evangelos Golias,Dominik Kriegner,Jairo Sinova,Mathias Kläui,Martin Jourdan,Sarnjeet S. Dhesi,Kevin W. Edmonds,Peter Wadley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.21.064030
IF: 4.6
2024-06-13
Physical Review Applied
Abstract:Antiferromagnetic materials hold potential for use in spintronic devices with fast operation frequencies and field robustness. Despite the rapid progress in proof-of-principle functionality in recent years, there has been a notable lack of understanding of antiferromagnetic domain formation and manipulation, which translates to either incomplete or nonscalable control of the magnetic order. Here, we demonstrate simple and functional ways of influencing the domain structure in CuMnAs and Mn 2 Au , two key materials of antiferromagnetic spintronics research, using device patterning and strain engineering. Comparing x-ray microscopy data from two different materials, we reveal the key parameters dictating domain formation in antiferromagnetic devices and show how the nontrivial interaction of magnetostriction, substrate clamping, and edge anisotropy leads to specific equilibrium domain configurations. More specifically, we observe that patterned edges have a significant impact on the magnetic anisotropy and domain structure over long distances and we propose a theoretical model that relates short-range edge anisotropy and long-range magnetoelastic interactions. The principles invoked are of general applicability to the domain formation and engineering in antiferromagnetic thin films at large, which will hopefully pave the way toward realizing truly functional antiferromagnetic devices. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.064030 © 2024 American Physical Society
physics, applied