A new benchmark problem for electromagnetic modelling of superconductors: the high-Tc superconducting dynamo

Mark Ainslie,Francesco Grilli,Loic Queval,Enric Pardo,Fernando Perez-Mendez,Ratu Mataira,Antonio Morandi,Asef Ghabeli,Chris Bumby,Roberto Brambilla
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/abae04
2021-01-18
Abstract:The high-Tc superconducting (HTS) dynamo is a promising device that can inject large DC supercurrents into a closed superconducting circuit. This is particularly attractive to energise HTS coils in NMR/MRI magnets and superconducting rotating machines without the need for connection to a power supply via current leads. It is only very recently that quantitatively accurate, predictive models have been developed which are capable of analysing HTS dynamos and explain their underlying physical mechanism. In this work, we propose to use the HTS dynamo as a new benchmark problem for the HTS modelling community. The benchmark geometry consists of a permanent magnet rotating past a stationary HTS coated-conductor wire in the open-circuit configuration, assuming for simplicity the 2D (infinitely long) case. Despite this geometric simplicity the solution is complex, comprising time-varying spatially-inhomogeneous currents and fields throughout the superconducting volume. In this work, this benchmark problem has been implemented using several different methods, including H-formulation-based methods, coupled H-A and T-A formulations, the Minimum Electromagnetic Entropy Production method, and integral equation and volume integral equation-based equivalent circuit methods. Each of these approaches show excellent qualitative and quantitative agreement for the open-circuit equivalent instantaneous voltage and the cumulative time-averaged equivalent voltage, as well as the current density and electric field distributions within the HTS wire at key positions during the magnet transit. A critical analysis and comparison of each of the modelling frameworks is presented, based on the following key metrics: number of mesh elements in the HTS wire, total number of mesh elements in the model, number of degrees of freedom (DOFs), tolerance settings and the approximate time taken per cycle for each model.
Computational Physics,Superconductivity
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve The paper aims to propose a new benchmark problem for high - temperature superconductor (HTS) modeling - the high - temperature superconducting generator (HTS dynamo). Specifically, the goals of the paper are as follows: 1. **Provide a standardized test case**: By defining a specific simplified geometric structure and clear input parameters (assumptions), different modeling methods can be verified and compared on this standard test case. 2. **Evaluate the performance of different modeling methods**: By comparing the calculation results of the open - circuit equivalent instantaneous voltage and the cumulative time - averaged equivalent voltage, evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of various modeling methods in terms of accuracy, computational efficiency, etc. 3. **Promote in - depth understanding of HTS generators**: By analyzing and comparing the results of different modeling methods in detail, help researchers better understand the working mechanism of HTS generators, thereby optimizing future device designs. ### Specific content of the benchmark problem - **Geometric structure**: The permanent magnet (PM) rotates counterclockwise at a constant speed past a stationary HTS - coated wire. A two - dimensional (infinitely long) case is assumed to simplify the calculation. - **Parameter settings**: Including the size of the PM, the remanent magnetic density, the width and thickness of the HTS wire, the critical current density \(J_c\), etc. - **Expected output**: The open - circuit equivalent instantaneous voltage waveform and the cumulative time - averaged equivalent voltage waveform, as well as the current density and electric field distribution within the HTS wire. ### Methods used The paper uses a variety of modeling methods to achieve this benchmark problem, including: - **Coupled H - A formula** (H - A) - **H - formula + shell current** (H + SC) - **Separated H - formula** (SEG - H) - **Minimum electromagnetic entropy generation method** (MEMEP) - **Coupled T - A formula** (T - A) - **Integral equation method** (IE) - **Equivalent circuit method based on volume integral equation** (VIE) ### Results - **Instantaneous voltage waveform**: The open - circuit equivalent instantaneous voltage waveforms calculated by each model show four consistent peaks and obvious left - right asymmetry, which are in line with the experimental results. - **Cumulative time - averaged voltage**: The cumulative time - averaged equivalent voltages \(V_{\text{cumul}}\) calculated by all models converge to a non - zero asymptotic value, indicating that the HTS generator can generate a DC output voltage. ### Summary Through this benchmark problem, researchers can verify and compare the performance of different modeling methods, thereby providing strong support for the design and optimization of HTS generators.