Abstract:AI-based social media platforms has already transformed the nature of economic and social interaction. AI enables the massive scale and highly personalized nature of online information sharing that we now take for granted. Extensive attention has been devoted to the polarization that social media platforms appear to facilitate. However, a key implication of the transformation we are experiencing due to these AI-powered platforms has received much less attention: how platforms impact what observers of online discourse come to believe about community views. These observers include policymakers and legislators, who look to social media to gauge the prospects for policy and legislative change, as well as developers of AI models trained on large-scale internet data, whose outputs may similarly reflect a distorted view of public opinion. In this paper, we present a nested game-theoretic model to show how observed online opinion is produced by the interaction of the decisions made by users about whether and with what rhetorical intensity to share their opinions on a platform, the efforts of organizations (such as traditional media and advocacy organizations) that seek to encourage or discourage opinion-sharing online, and the operation of AI-powered recommender systems controlled by social media platforms. We show that signals from ideological organizations encourage an increase in rhetorical intensity, leading to the 'rational silence' of moderate users. This, in turn, creates a polarized impression of where average opinions lie. We also show that this observed polarization can also be amplified by recommender systems that encourage the formation of communities online that end up seeing a skewed sample of opinion. We also identify practical strategies platforms can implement, such as reducing exposure to signals from ideological organizations and a tailored approach to content moderation.

How social feedback processing in the brain shapes collective opinion processes in the era of social media

Opinion Polarization by Learning from Social Feedback

Biased processing and opinion polarization: experimental refinement of argument communication theory in the context of the energy debate

The Sound of Silence in Social Networks

Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation

Public discourse and social network echo chambers driven by socio-cognitive biases

Modelling opinion misperception and the emergence of silence in online social system

Modeling opinion misperception and the emergence of silence in online social system

A dynamical model of platform choice and online segregation

Disentangling the Echo Chamber: How Exposure to Congruent and Incongruent Opinion Climates on Social Networking Sites Impacts Users’ Processing and Selection of Information

Multivariate opinion evolution analysis on individual opinion differences: An agent-based model

Modelling opinion dynamics under the impact of influencer and media strategies

Phase Field Modeling in Social Media Dynamics:Simulation of Opinion Evolution with Feedback, Separation

Opinion formation in an open system and the spiral of silence

Rational Silence and False Polarization: How Viewpoint Organizations and Recommender Systems Distort the Expression of Public Opinion

Modelling Opinion Dynamics in the Age of Algorithmic Personalisation

Social Influence and Unfollowing Accelerate the Emergence of Echo Chambers

Modeling confirmation bias and peer pressure in opinion dynamics

Influence of media on collective debates

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Group Decision Making and Beyond 1. Echo Chambers and Random Polarization

Dynamics of Opinions and Social Structures