Abstract:Background: The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score is one of the most common and adapted outcome scales in hallux valgus surgery. However, AOFAS is predominantly physician based and not patient based. Although it may be straightforward to derive statistical significance, it may not equate to the true subjective benefit of the patient’s experience. There is a paucity of literature defining MCID for AOFAS in hallux valgus surgery although it could have a great impact on the accuracy of analyzing surgical outcomes. Hence, the primary aim of this study was to define the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the AOFAS score in these patients, and the secondary aim was to correlate patients’ demographics to the MCID. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study. A total of 446 patients were reviewed preoperatively and followed up for 2 years. An anchor question was asked 2 years postoperation: “How would you rate the overall results of your treatment for your foot and ankle condition?” (excellent, very good, good, fair, poor, terrible). The MCID was derived using 4 methods, 3 from an anchor-based approach and 1 from a distribution-based approach. Anchor-based approaches were (1) mean difference in 2-year AOFAS scores of patients who answered “good” versus “fair” based on the anchor question; (2) mean change of AOFAS score preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up in patients who answered good; (3) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves method, where the area under the curve (AUC) represented the likelihood that the scoring system would accurately discriminate these 2 groups of patients. The distribution-based approach used to calculate MCID was the effect size method. There were 405 (90.8%) females and 41 (9.2%) males. Mean age was 51.2 (standard deviation [SD] = 13) years, mean preoperative BMI was 24.2 (SD = 4.1). Results: Mean preoperative AOFAS score was 55.6 (SD = 16.8), with significant improvement to 85.7 (SD = 14.4) in 2 years ( P value < .001). There were no statistical differences between demographics or preoperative AOFAS scores of patients with good versus fair satisfaction levels. At 2 years, patients who had good satisfaction had higher AOFAS scores than fair satisfaction (83.9 vs 78.1, P < .001) and higher mean change (30.2 vs 22.3, P = .015). Mean change in AOFAS score in patients with good satisfaction was 30.2 (SD = 19.8). Mean difference in good versus fair satisfaction was 7.9. Using ROC analysis, the cut-off point is 29.0, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.62. Effect size method derived an MCID of 8.4 with a moderate effect size of 0.5. Multiple linear regression demonstrated increasing age (β = −0.129, CI = −0.245, –0.013, P = .030) and higher preoperative AOFAS score (β = −0.874, CI = −0.644, –0.081, P < .001) to significantly decrease the amount of change in the AOFAS score. Conclusion: The MCID of AOFAS score in hallux valgus surgery was 7.9 to 30.2. The MCID can ensure clinical improvement from a patient’s perspective and also aid in interpreting results from clinical trials and other studies. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Calculation of the minimal clinically important difference in operated patients with adult spine deformity: advantages of the ROC method and significance of prevalence in threshold selection

Calculation of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) using different methodologies: case study and practical guide

Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Patient-reported Outcome Measures in de novo Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis <i>Is it Appropriate to Apply the Values of Adult Spine Deformity</i>?

Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Patient-reported Outcome Measures in de novo Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Using PROMIS CAT in Cervical Spine Surgery

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Clinical Significance

Minimal Clinically Important Differences for American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Score in Hallux Valgus Surgery

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Changes Greatly Based on the Different Calculation Methods

Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity

P306. Using Oswestry Disability Index as a preoperative surgical eligibility criterion for patients requiring lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease

Challenges in applying minimal clinically important difference: a critical review

PROMIS and FAAM Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Foot and Ankle Orthopedics

Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores

Using Oswestry Disability Index as a Preoperative Surgical Eligibility Criterion for Patients Requiring Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease

Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability

Evaluation of the “Minimal Clinically Important Difference” (MCID) of the KOOS, KSS and SF-12 scores after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

The Scoliosis Research Society adult spinal deformity standard outcome set

Assessment of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Neurological Function and Quality of Life after Surgery in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of shoulder functional scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective study

A Statistical Inference Framework for the Minimal Clinically Important Difference