P306. Using Oswestry Disability Index as a preoperative surgical eligibility criterion for patients requiring lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease

Tariq Ziad Issa,Ameer Haider,Omar Tarawneh,Rajkishen Narayanan,Jose A Canseco,Alexander R. Vaccaro,Gregory Douglas Schroeder,Christopher K. Kepler,Alan S. Hilibrand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.429

IF: 4.297

2024-08-19

The Spine Journal

Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT As payers invest in alternative payment models, some are suggesting threshold cutoffs of patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in reimbursement approvals for orthopedic procedures. The feasibility of this has not been investigated in spine surgery. PURPOSE To evaluate how preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) thresholds might affect minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following lumbar fusion. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE We included all adult patients undergoing 1-3 level primary lumbar fusion at a single urban tertiary academic center from 2014-2020. OUTCOME MEASURES The percent of patients meeting MCID were determined among patients "approved" or "denied" at each threshold. At each threshold, the positive predictive value (PPV) for MCID attainment was calculated. METHODS ODI was collected preoperatively and one-year postoperatively. We implemented theoretical threshold cutoffs at increments of 10. MCID was set at 14.3. The percentage of patients meeting MCID were determined among patients "approved" or "denied" at each threshold. At each threshold, the positive predictive value (PPV) for MCID attainment was calculated. RESULTS A total 1,368 patients were included and 62.4% (N=364) achieved MCID. As the ODI thresholds increased, a greater percentage of patients in each group reached the MCID. At the lowest ODI threshold, 6.58% (N=90) of patients would be denied, rising to 20.2%, 39.5%, 58.4%, 79.9%, and 91.4% at ODI thresholds of 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70, respectively. The PPV increased from 0.072 among patients with ODI>20 to 0.919 at ODI>70. The number of patients denied a clinical improvement in the denied category per patient achieving the MCID increased at each threshold (ODI>20: 1.96; ODI>30: 2.40; ODI>40: 2.75; ODI>50: 3.03; ODI>60: 3.54; ODI>70: 3.75). CONCLUSIONS Patients with poorer preoperative ODI are significantly more likely to achieve MCID following lumbar spine fusion at all ODI thresholds. Setting a preoperative ODI threshold for surgical eligibility will restrict access to patients who may benefit from spine fusion, despite ODI >20 demonstrating the lowest predictive value for MCID achievement. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

clinical neurology,orthopedics