David Penny (1938–2024)

Matthew J. Phillips,Anthony M. Poole,Patricia A. McLenachan,Peter J. Lockhart,Michael D. Hendy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02540-3

IF: 19.1

2024-09-11

Nature Ecology & Evolution

Abstract:Theoretical biologist who 'tamed' mathematicians and tested the theory of evolution.

ecology,evolutionary biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

David Blockley (1941–2024): systems thinker, pioneer, and practitioner

Mark W. Milke Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering,University of Canterbury,Christchurch,New Zealand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2024.2407131

2024-10-18

Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems

Abstract:David Blockley was born in Derbyshire, England, in 1941. He graduated from the University of Sheffield in 1964 and gained his PhD there in 1967. For two years, David worked as a Development Engineer with the British Constructional Steelwork Association in London. In 1969, he began a career at the University of Bristol. He was promoted to a readership in 1982 and a personal Chair in 1989. In the same year he was appointed as Head of the Department of Civil Engineering, a position he held until 1994, when he was elected Dean of Engineering, a position he held until 1998. He was again Head of Civil Engineering from 2002 until his retirement in 2006. By his retirement, David had supervised roughly 30 PhD students. He was a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, the Institution of Civil Engineers, the Institution of Structural Engineers and the Royal Society of Arts, and received a DSc in honour of his achievements. He was the President of the Institution of Structural Engineers during 2001–2002. He was a Non-Executive Director of Bristol Water plc from 1998 to 2007. David authored over 180 papers and ten books, and won several technical awards for his work, including The Telford Gold Medal of the Institution of Civil Engineers. He is survived by his wife of over 57 years, Karen, and their two children, Andrew and Alison.

engineering, civil
Mendel and Darwin

Andrew Berry,Janet Browne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122144119

2022-07-28

Abstract:Evolution by natural selection is an explicitly genetic theory. Darwin recognized that a working theory of inheritance was central to his theory and spent much of his scientific life seeking one. The seeds of his attempt to fill this gap, his "provisional hypothesis" of pangenesis, appear in his notebooks when he was first formulating his evolutionary ideas. Darwin, in short, desperately needed Mendel. In this paper, we set Mendel's work in the context of experimental biology and animal/plant breeding of the period and review both the well-known story of possible contact between Mendel and Darwin and the actual contact between their ideas after their deaths. Mendel's contributions to evolutionary biology were fortuitous. Regardless, it is Mendel's work that completed Darwin's theory. The modern theory based on the marriage between Mendel's and Darwin's ideas as forged most comprehensively by R. A. Fisher is both Darwin's achievement and Mendel's.

multidisciplinary sciences
David Hopkin Lewis, B.A., D.Phil. (1937–2023)

Peter G. AyresJeffrey G. Ducketta Department of Biological Sciences,Lancaster University,Lancaster LA1 4YQ,UKb The Natural History Museum,Cromwell Road,London SW7 5BD,UK

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2024.2348946

2024-05-16

Journal of Bryology

Abstract:David Lewis (), who died last year at the age of 85, regularly attended paper-reading meetings of the BBS, and its annual general meetings, from the 1960s to the 1980s. He was a frequent speaker on bryophyte biochemistry. His studies of soluble carbohydrates and lignin in bryophytes were groundbreaking, drawing on his considerable chemical and technical expertise, although he happily admitted his reliance on BBS members for the identification and collection of source materials.

plant sciences
A Conversation with A. Philip Dawid

Vladimir Vovk,Glenn Shafer

2023-12-01

Abstract:Beginning in the 1970s, Alexander Philip Dawid has been a leading contributor to the foundations of statistics and especially to the development and application of Bayesian statistics. He is also known for his work on causality, especially his notation for conditional independence and his critique of the overuse of counterfactuals, and for his contributions to forensic statistics. Dawid was born in Lancashire, England, on February 1, 1946. His family moved to London soon afterwards, and he attended the City of London School from 1956 to 1963. He studied mathematics at Cambridge, earning a BA (Bachelor of Arts) degree in 1966. After earning a Diploma in Mathematical Statistics in the academic year 1966-1967, he studied for a PhD at Imperial, then at UCL, where he became a Lecturer in Statistics in 1969. In 1978, he left UCL for a position as Professor of Statistics in the Department of Mathematics, The City University, London, where he served as Head of Statistics Section and Director of the Statistical Laboratory. He returned to the Department of Statistics at UCL in 1981, serving as Head of Department from 1983 to 1993. He moved to the University of Cambridge in 2007, becoming Professor of Statistics and Fellow of Darwin College. He has continued his work in mathematical statistics after retiring from Cambridge in 2013 and was elected Fellow of the Royal Society in 2018.

Other Statistics
ReviewLaws in Darwinian evolutionary theory

P. Ao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PLREV.2005.03.002

IF: 9.833

2005-01-01

Physics of Life Reviews

Abstract:In the present article the recent works to formulate laws in Darwinian evolutionary dynamics are discussed. Although there is a strong consensus that general laws in biology may exist, opinions opposing such suggestion are abundant. Based on recent progress in both mathematics and biology, another attempt to address this issue is made in the present article. Specifically, three laws which form a mathematical framework for the evolutionary dynamics in biology are postulated. The second law is most quantitative and is explicitly expressed in the unique form of a stochastic differential equation. Salient features of Darwinian evolutionary dynamics are captured by this law: the probabilistic nature of evolution, ascendancy, and the adaptive landscape. Four dynamical elements are introduced in this formulation: the ascendant matrix, the transverse matrix, the Wright evolutionary potential, and the stochastic drive. The first law may be regarded as a special case of the second law. It gives the reference point to discuss the evolutionary dynamics. The third law describes the relationship between the focused level of description to its lower and higher ones, and defines the dichotomy of deterministic and stochastic drives. It is an acknowledgement of the hierarchical structure in biology. A new interpretation of Fisher\u0027s fundamental theorem of natural selection is provided in terms of the F-theorem. The proposed laws are based on continuous representation in both time and population. Their generic nature is demonstrated through their equivalence to classical formulations. The present three laws appear to provide a coherent framework for the further development of the subject.
Laws in Darwinian Evolutionary Theory

P. Ao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2005.03.002

2006-01-01

Abstract:In the present article the recent works to formulate laws in Darwinian evolutionary dynamics are discussed. Although there is a strong consensus that general laws in biology may exist, opinions opposing such suggestion are abundant. Based on recent progress in both mathematics and biology, another attempt to address this issue is made in the present article. Specifically, three laws which form a mathematical framework for the evolutionary dynamics in biology are postulated. The second law is most quantitative and is explicitly expressed in the unique form of a stochastic differential equation. Salient features of Darwinian evolutionary dynamics are captured by this law: the probabilistic nature of evolution, ascendancy, and the adaptive landscape. Four dynamical elements are introduced in this formulation: the ascendant matrix, the transverse matrix, the Wright evolutionary potential, and the stochastic drive. The first law may be regarded as a special case of the second law. It gives the reference point to discuss the evolutionary dynamics. The third law describes the relationship between the focused level of description to its lower and higher ones, and defines the dichotomy of deterministic and stochastic drives. It is an acknowledgement of the hierarchical structure in biology. A new interpretation of Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection is provided in terms of the F-Theorem. The proposed laws are based on continuous representation in both time and population. Their generic nature is demonstrated through their equivalence to classical formulations. The present three laws appear to provide a coherent framework for the further development of the subject.
David Olive: his life and work

Edward Corrigan,Peter Goddard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.05849

2020-09-13

Abstract:David Olive, who died in Barton, Cambridgeshire, on 7 November 2012, aged 75, was a theoretical physicist who made seminal contributions to the development of string theory and to our understanding of the structure of quantum field theory. In early work on $S$-matrix theory, he helped to provide the conceptual framework within which string theory was initially formulated. His work, with Gliozzi and Scherk, on supersymmetry in string theory made possible the whole idea of superstrings, now understood as the natural framework for string theory. Olive's pioneering insights about the duality between electric and magnetic objects in gauge theories were way ahead of their time; it took two decades before his bold and courageous duality conjectures began to be understood. Although somewhat quiet and reserved, he took delight in the company of others, generously sharing his emerging understanding of new ideas with students and colleagues. He was widely influential, not only through the depth and vision of his original work, but also because the clarity, simplicity and elegance of his expositions of new and difficult ideas and theories provided routes into emerging areas of research, both for students and for the theoretical physics community more generally.

History and Philosophy of Physics
David George Kendall, a biographical account

Geoffrey Grimmett

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0810.1091

2008-10-07

History and Overview

Abstract:This biographical account of the life and work of David Kendall includes details of his personal and professional activities. Kendall is probably best known for his work in applied probability, especially queueing theory, and in stochastic analysis and spatial statistics.
Philip Benfey (1953–2023)

Kenneth D. Birnbaum,Siobhan M. Brady,Kimberley L. Gallagher,Jee Jung,Olivier Pourquié,Ben Scheres,Rachel Shahan,Rosangela Sozzani,Lucia Strader

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01789-7

IF: 18

2024-09-19

Nature Plants

Abstract:An archetype of collaboration, community development and vision, who made fundamental contributions to biology through his studies on the often-unseen part of the plant, the root.

plant sciences
Mendel and Darwin: untangling a persistent enigma

Daniel J. Fairbanks

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-019-0289-9

IF: 3.832

2019-12-17

Heredity

Abstract:Abstract Mendel and Darwin were contemporaries, with much overlap in their scientifically productive years. Available evidence shows that Mendel knew much about Darwin, whereas Darwin knew nothing of Mendel. Because of the fragmentary nature of this evidence, published inferences regarding Mendel’s views on Darwinian evolution are contradictory and enigmatic, with claims ranging from enthusiastic acceptance to outright rejection. The objective of this review is to examine evidence from Mendel’s published and private writings on evolution and Darwin, and the influence of the scientific environment in which he was immersed. Much of this evidence lies in Mendel’s handwritten annotations in his copies of Darwin’s books, which this review scrutinises in detail. Darwin’s writings directly influenced Mendel’s classic 1866 paper, and his letters to Nägeli. He commended and criticised Darwin on specific issues pertinent to his research, including the provisional hypothesis of pangenesis, the role of pollen in fertilisation, and the influence of “conditions of life” on heritable variation. In his final letter to Nägeli, Mendel proposed a Darwinian scenario for natural selection using the same German term for “struggle for existence” as in his copies of Darwin’s books. His published and private scientific writings are entirely objective, devoid of polemics or religious allusions, and address evolutionary questions in a manner consistent with that of his scientific contemporaries. The image that emerges of Mendel is of a meticulous scientist who accepted the tenets of Darwinian evolution, while privately pinpointing aspects of Darwin’s views of inheritance that were not supported by Mendel’s own experiments.

genetics & heredity,ecology,evolutionary biology
Darwin Turing Dawkins: Building a General Theory of Evolution

Leonard M. Adleman

2024-02-16

Abstract:Living things, computers, societies, and even books are part of a grand evolutionary struggle to survive. That struggle shapes nature, nations, religions, art, science, and you. What you think, feel, and do is determined by it. Darwinian evolution does not apply solely to the genes that are stored in DNA. Using the insights of Alan Turing and Richard Dawkins, we will see that it also applies to the memes we store in our brains and the information we store in our computers. The next time you run for president, fight a war, or just deal with the ordinary problems humans are heir to, perhaps this book will be of use. If you want to understand why and when you will die, or if you want to achieve greatness this book may help. If you are concerned about where the computer revolution is headed, this book may provide some answers.

General Literature,Artificial Intelligence,Populations and Evolution
Charles Darwin as a statistical thinker

André Ariew

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.08.005

Abstract:Recently historians and philosophers of science have been interested in the role of statistics and probability in investigating population variation. The focus is typically on investigators applying statistics and probability to explain large scale phenomenon that arise out of the collective behavior of numerous and varied individuals. The case studies that inform this work come mostly from molecular physics and 20th century genetical versions of evolutionary theory. Charles Darwin's work on evolution is rarely mentioned in this context except to point out his shortcomings-he made evolutionary theory "ripe" for statistical investigations, but he was not a statistical thinker. But this is a mistake, Darwin was a statistical thinker. In this essay I describe two instances where Darwin utilized statistical methods to investigate evolution. In the light of these cases, we ought to revise our views about Darwin's scientific methodology, in particular, how he came to develop his ideas about evolution and about the nature of his "population thinking". Furthermore, Darwin's cases provide us with an expanded view about what constitutes "statistical thinking" in the biological sciences. In the examples we will find Darwin using statistical measures of type frequencies to detect large scale ensemble effects, confirm hypotheses by comparing between expected and observed averages, and applying the astronomer's law of error to explain evolutionary trends.
Foundations of ecological and evolutionary change

A. Bradley Duthie,Victor J. Luque

2024-09-17

Abstract:Biological evolution is realised through the same mechanisms of birth and death that underlie change in population density. The deep interdependence between ecology and evolution is well-established, but much theory in each discipline has been developed in isolation. While recent work has accomplished eco-evolutionary synthesis, a gap remains between the logical foundations of ecology and evolution. We bridge this gap with a new equation that defines a summed value for a characteristic across individuals in a population, from which the fundamental equations of population ecology and evolutionary biology (the Price equation) are derived. We thereby unify the fundamental equations of population ecology and biological evolution under a general framework. Our unification further demonstrates the equivalence between mean population growth rate and evolutionary fitness, shows how ecological and evolutionary change are reflected in the first and second statistical moments of fitness, respectively, and links this change to ecosystem function.

Populations and Evolution
Stefan Bengtson (1947–2024)

Vivi Vajda,Andrew H. Knoll

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02581-8

IF: 19.1

2024-11-06

Nature Ecology & Evolution

Abstract:A palaeontologist of varied interests who realized biomineralized fauna were key to understanding early animal evolution

ecology,evolutionary biology
Teaching Evolutionary Psychology: An Interview with David M. Buss

Lewis Barker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3301_11

2006-01-01

Teaching of Psychology

Abstract:David M. Buss received his PhD from the University of California at Berkeley, and has taught at Harvard University, the University of Michigan, and the University of Texas at Austin. He has received the American Psychological Foundation Distinguished Scientific Award for Early Career Contributions and the American Psychological Association's Distinguished Scientist Lecturer Award and has been a G. Stanley Hall Lecturer. His books include The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating (2003) and Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind (2004), which won the Robert W. Hamilton Book Award. His most recent books are The Murderer Next Door: Why the Mind Is Designed to Kill (2005b) and The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (2005a). Buss has roughly 200 publications. His research interests include mating strategies, murder, and sexual conflict. Lewis Barker received his BA in psychology from Occidental College in Los Angeles and an MA and PhD from Florida State University. He taught for 28 years at Baylor University in Texas where he was Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience. He currently is a professor of psychology at Auburn University. Over his career, he has taught 18 different undergraduate courses, 9 graduate courses, and 5 labs. Introduction to Biopsychology, first taught in 1974, was among the earliest freshman-level course offerings in evolutionary and physiological psychology in the United States. He has numerous publications and book chapters and has edited 2 books in the general area of human and animal learning. Currently, he is researching how students' knowledge of psychology terms is related to their overall understanding of psychological concepts. He has written two textbooks, Learning and Behavior: Biological, Psychological, and Sociocultural Perspectives, and Psychology —the latter from an evolutionary perspective. He has 3 adult daughters and 2 grandchildren, all of whom live in Texas.

psychology, multidisciplinary,education & educational research
Mathematical Demonstration of Darwinian Theory of Evolution

Vernon Williams

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1006.0480

2010-06-03

Populations and Evolution

Abstract:Darwin's book, Origin of the Species has been a source of public controversy for more than hundred and fifty years. Court cases and mountains of words have not dispelled this controversy. In this paper, a quantitative approach using simple mathematics shows that the concept of evolution by natural selection using only random choice of variables does work. The procedure applied to the optical equations forming the phenotype of a spider eye produces an eye design modeled after the measurements by Land and Barth.
Darwin's foil: the evolving uses of William Paley's Natural Theology 1802-2005

Adam R Shapiro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.11.010

Abstract:This essay traces the divergent readings of William Paley's 1802 Natural Theology from its initial publication to the recent controversies over intelligent design. It argues that the misinterpretation of the Natural Theology as a scientific argument about the origins of complex life-which Darwin's Origin of Species refutes-did not develop all at once. Rather this reading evolved gradually, drawing from a variety of uses and appropriations during the course of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. This study demonstrates the fluidity of "science" and "religion" during these centuries, and highlights the role that genres of science popularization play in altering the meaning of those categories.
William Lawrence Tower's Beetles: Experimental Evolution and the Manipulation of Inheritance

Eric J Richards

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-024-09771-x

Abstract:William Lawrence Tower's work on the evolution of the Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata), documenting the environmental induction of mutation and speciation, made him a leading figure in experimental genetics during the first decade of the 20th century. His research program served as a model for other experimental evolution studies seeking to demonstrate the environmental modification of inheritance. Tower enjoyed the support of influential figures in the field, despite well-known problems that plagued Tower's earlier academic career. The validity of his genetic work, and other findings reported by Tower, were later challenged. The Tower affair illustrates how questionable and possibly fraudulent scientific practices can be tolerated to explore certain experimental directions and theoretical frameworks, particularly at the frontier of expanding disciplines. When needed, those explorations can be forestalled or extinguished by exploiting conspicuous vulnerabilities of rogue practitioners. In Tower's case, both unrefuted allegations of scientific misconduct and personal problems dissolved his institutional support, leading to a swift ouster from academic science. Tower's downfall discredited soft inheritance and neo-Lamarckian conceptions in the field of experimental genetics, facilitating the discipline's embrace of a hard inheritance model that featured a hereditary material resistant to environmental modification.
John Tyler Bonner: Remembering a scientific pioneer

Ingo Brigandt,Laura A Katz,Vidyanand Nanjundiah,Scott F Gilbert,Peter R Grant,B Rosemary Grant,Alan C Love,Stuart A Newman,Mary J West-Eberhard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22920

Abstract:Throughout his life, John Tyler Bonner contributed to major transformations in the fields of developmental and evolutionary biology. He pondered the evolution of complexity and the significance of randomness in evolution, and was instrumental in the formation of evolutionary developmental biology. His contributions were vast, ranging from highly technical scientific articles to numerous books written for a broad audience. This historical vignette gathers reflections by several prominent researchers on the greatness of John Bonner and the implications of his work.
Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress

Zuoyue Wang

1999-01-01

Isis

Abstract:Mechanics, Dijksterhuis said, should be taught in a mathematical way; for him mechanics was the mathematization of the basic physical concepts. And he characterized the Scientific Revolution as the mechanization of the world picture, in which, again, mathematization played the central role. His position in the debate about the “two cultures” can be seen in the same light: he argued that, fundamentally, the scientific method is as applicable to the arts as to the natural sciences; in both, generalization and mathematization should be the governing notions. This book is the result of extensive research: van Berkel consulted numerous archives, personal as well as institutional. His style is professional throughout, and the beginning and the end of the book are especially well written. For the benefit of both van Berkel's subject and his potential readers, it is to be hoped that a version of this biography will eventually be …

David Penny (1938–2024)

David Blockley (1941–2024): systems thinker, pioneer, and practitioner

Mendel and Darwin

David Hopkin Lewis, B.A., D.Phil. (1937–2023)

A Conversation with A. Philip Dawid

ReviewLaws in Darwinian evolutionary theory

Laws in Darwinian Evolutionary Theory

David Olive: his life and work

David George Kendall, a biographical account

Philip Benfey (1953–2023)

Mendel and Darwin: untangling a persistent enigma

Darwin Turing Dawkins: Building a General Theory of Evolution

Charles Darwin as a statistical thinker

Foundations of ecological and evolutionary change

Stefan Bengtson (1947–2024)

Teaching Evolutionary Psychology: An Interview with David M. Buss

Mathematical Demonstration of Darwinian Theory of Evolution

Darwin's foil: the evolving uses of William Paley's Natural Theology 1802-2005

William Lawrence Tower's Beetles: Experimental Evolution and the Manipulation of Inheritance

John Tyler Bonner: Remembering a scientific pioneer

Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress