Abstract:To investigate factors associated with different reproductive outcomes in patients with Caesarean scar pregnancies (CSPs).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve
This paper aims to explore the factors influencing reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after receiving different surgical treatments. Specifically, the researchers aim to understand the following points:
1. **The impact of different surgical methods on reproductive outcomes**: The researchers compared the reproductive outcomes of CSP patients undergoing ultrasound-guided uterine aspiration and laparoscopic scar repair to determine if there are significant differences.
2. **Factors influencing reproductive outcomes**: The researchers analyzed various factors that might affect the reproductive outcomes of CSP patients, including age, body mass index (BMI), number of pregnancies, number of miscarriages, number of cesarean sections, hospital stay duration, weeks of amenorrhea, maximum diameter of the gestational sac, residual myometrial thickness at the scar, CSP type, surgical method, uterine artery embolization, major bleeding, postoperative uterine adhesions, etc.
3. **Risk factors for recurrent CSP**: The researchers specifically focused on identifying factors that might lead to CSP recurrence and evaluated the predictive value of these factors.
### Research Background
Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) refers to the implantation of a fertilized egg at the site of a previous cesarean section scar, which is a serious complication of cesarean sections. The incidence of CSP is approximately 1:216 to 1:1800, accounting for 1.15% of women with a history of cesarean sections. If not treated promptly, CSP can lead to severe consequences such as massive bleeding, uterine rupture, damage to surrounding organs, and even hysterectomy. Currently, surgical treatment is the main approach for CSP, but the impact of different surgical methods on reproductive outcomes remains unclear.
### Methods
The researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of 549 CSP patients treated in the gynecology department of Hubei Maternal and Child Health Hospital from May 2017 to July 2022. Among them, 100 patients with fertility needs were included in the study and their reproductive outcomes were tracked. These patients were divided into live birth group, miscarriage group, recurrent CSP group, and secondary infertility group for analysis.
### Results
1. **Reproductive Outcomes**:
- Among the 100 patients, 43% (43/100) had live births, 19% (19/100) had miscarriages, 38% (38/100) had secondary infertility, and 15% (15/100) had recurrent CSP.
- Patients in the live birth group had significantly fewer pregnancies and miscarriages than those in the non-live birth group, and the incidence of intrauterine adhesions, postoperative miscarriages, secondary infertility, and recurrent CSP was significantly lower than in the non-live birth group.
- Patients in the miscarriage group had significantly more pregnancies than those in the non-miscarriage group, lower BMI, significantly lower live birth rates, and significantly higher incidence of recurrent CSP than those in the non-miscarriage group.
- Patients in the recurrent CSP group had significantly more pregnancies than those in the non-recurrent CSP group, significantly higher postoperative miscarriage rates, and significantly lower live birth rates than those in the non-recurrent CSP group.
- Patients in the secondary infertility group had significantly lower live birth rates and postoperative miscarriage rates than those in the non-secondary infertility group, and significantly higher incidence of intrauterine adhesions than those in the non-secondary infertility group.
2. **Influencing Factors**:
- Univariate analysis showed that postoperative miscarriage is the only risk factor for recurrent CSP, with an odds ratio (OR) of 11.25, 95% confidence interval of 3.302–38.325, P < 0.01.
- Multivariate logistic regression analysis further confirmed this result, indicating that postoperative miscarriage has a certain predictive value for the occurrence of recurrent CSP (AUC = 0.741).
### Conclusion
1. **Impact of surgical methods on reproductive outcomes**: There is no significant difference in reproductive outcomes for CSP patients between different surgical methods (ultrasound-guided uterine aspiration and laparoscopic scar repair).
2. **Risk factors for recurrent CSP**: Postoperative miscarriage is the only risk factor for recurrent CSP and has a certain predictive value.
3. **Clinical recommendations**: CSP patients should avoid miscarriages postoperatively to reduce the risk of recurrent CSP. For CSP patients with fertility needs, they should be encouraged to conceive again and be closely monitored in early pregnancy to detect and manage recurrent CSP promptly.