Clinical Application of a New Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Classification and Evaluation System and a Risk Scoring System
Peiying Fu,Ling Zhang,Ting Zhou,Shixuan Wang,Ronghua Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s445327
IF: 2.145
2024-01-17
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Peiying Fu, &ast Ling Zhang, &ast Ting Zhou, Shixuan Wang, Ronghua Liu Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Ronghua Liu, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Anv., Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, People's Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86-27-83663078, Email Objective: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is an uncommon form of ectopic pregnancy that carries the risk of severe bleeding. To date, there has not been a universally accepted classification and treatment strategy. We performed this study to establish a risk scoring system and new CSP classification system for CSP and evaluate its efficacy. Methods: A total of five groups were generated based on different methods of treatment, and the factors that increase the risk of intraoperative bleeding were examined in our center from 2013 to 2018. The construction of a risk scoring system in this study was based on the use of the chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis. To determine the appropriate cutoff scores, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Results: We identified the main high-risk factors for excessive intraoperative hemorrhage during CSP surgery through univariate and multivariate analyses. Within this investigation, the risk factors included gestational sac location and gestational sac diameter. Through analysis, an optimal cutoff score of 3 was determined, and the area under the ROC curve was calculated to be 0.8113 (95% CI=0.7696– 0.8531). A score ranging from 0– 3 was classified as low risk, while a score ranging from 5– 7 was classified as high risk. Additionally, a new classification system for CSP has been established based on sonographic parameters. We also established a diagnostic and treatment process for CSP patients according to the risk scoring method and new CSP classification. Conclusion: We identified the high-risk factors associated with bleeding during CSP surgery and developed a scoring system incorporating these factors. The utilization of this novel CSP typing method, in conjunction with the risk scoring system, can effectively inform doctors in their decision-making process concerning treatment strategies for patients with CSP. Keywords: cesarean scar pregnancy, scoring system, risk, classification, treatment Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) presents mainly as the implantation of a blastocyst within myometrial scar tissue in the anterior lower uterine segment. When a patient suffers from hemorrhagic shock, emergency surgery may be needed, and the uterus may be removed. If surgery is not performed in time, the life of patients may be endangered. CSP is currently categorized into two or three subtypes according to the site of the cesarean section scar and its relationship with the cesarean section scar. 1,2 Several scholars have proposed different classification methods. Specifically, Du et al proposed one type of CSP based on the size of the cesarean scar defect (CSD) and demonstrated its value in evaluating the risk of CSP and guiding the choice of treatment strategies. 3 However, both of these methods have many drawbacks. For example, these classification methods are based primarily on whether the gestational sac is located within the uterine cavity or on the thickness of the scar, which may lead to poor practicability. Therefore, choosing an appropriate treatment approach is not conducive to doctors, and there is no agreement on the best management method for CSP. When making treatment decisions, doctors are influenced by various factors, such as the patient's overall condition, CSP classification, blood flow status, and level of experience. Presently, a growing number of doctors opt for treatment methods that align with the CSP classification. Irrespective of the classification approach, the most suitable treatment modality for type I CSP is dilatation and curettage (D&C) or hysteroscopy. From an economic perspective, some scholars suggest D&C as the more suitable option. Even so, some doctors may consider pretreatment with methotrexate (MTX) or uterine artery embolization (UAE) before surgery. 4–6 Whether these approaches are appropriate is worth discussing. Hysteroscopy in conjunction with laparoscopy for type I CSP is the most successful option, but for type I CSP, D&C could be the most cost-effective option. Some doctors also use scar thickness as the main basis for choosing a treatment plan. A recen -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal