Analysis of Risk Factors for Intraoperative Bleeding in the Surgical Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Development of Predictive Models
Xiao-Li Wan,Xu Wang,Zhi-Ping Feng,Xiao-Ling Zhou,Zhen-Wen Han,Jia-Mei Wu,Hong-Mei Xu,Ting Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s458968
2024-05-02
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Xiao-Li Wan, 1 Xu Wang, 1 Zhi-Ping Feng, 1 Xiao-Ling Zhou, 1 Zhen-Wen Han, 1 Jia-Mei Wu, 1 Hong-Mei Xu, 1 Ting Hu 2 1 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, People's Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan, 614000, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Ting Hu, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 55 Section 4, Renmin South Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 18615786531, Email Hong-Mei Xu, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, People's Hospital of Leshan, No. 238 of BaiTa Street, Shizhong District, Leshan, Sichuan, 614000, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 18981392030, Email Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the risk factors associated with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and to develop a model for predicting intraoperative bleeding risk. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 208 patients with CSP who were admitted to the People's Hospital of Leshan between January 2018 and December 2022. Based on whether intraoperative bleeding was ≥ 200 mL, we categorized them into two groups for comparative analysis: the excessive bleeding group (n = 27) and the control group (n = 181). Identifying relevant factors, we constructed a prediction model and created a nomogram. Results: We observed that there were significant differences between the two groups in several parameters. These included the time of menstrual cessation ( P = 0.002), maximum diameter of the gestational sac ( P < 0.001), thickness of the myometrium at the uterine scar ( P = 0.001), pre-treatment blood HCG levels ( P = 0.016), and the grade of blood flow signals ( P < 0.001). We consolidated the above data and constructed a clinical prediction model. The model exhibited favorable results in terms of predictive efficacy, discriminative ability (C-index = 0.894, specificity = 0.834, sensitivity = 0.852), calibration precision (mean absolute error = 0.018), and clinical decision-making utility, indicating its effectiveness. Conclusion: The clinical prediction model related to the risk of hemorrhage that we developed in this experiment can assist in the development of appropriate interventions and effectively improve patient prognosis. Keywords: cesarean section, prediction modeling, risk factors, uterine scar pregnancy Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a distinctive form of ectopic pregnancy where the fertilized egg implants itself in the scar from a previous cesarean section. 1 This condition can lead to uncontrolled bleeding, uterine rupture, damage to surrounding organs, and even the need for a hysterectomy during the removal surgery and postoperative care. These associated risks can pose significant threats to the patient's reproductive health and overall well-being. 1,2 Recent trends reveal a progressive increase in the incidence of CSP, attributable to changes in fertility policies, advancements in diagnostic technology, and the high rate of cesarean sections. 3,4 Statistical data indicates a CSP prevalence of 1.15% among women with a history of cesarean sections. Therefore, accurate preoperative prediction of the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage is crucial for clinicians to make informed clinical decisions. 5 Most previous predictive models for CSP have solely relied on clinical data, lacking the inclusion of laboratory data, which has undermined their persuasiveness. In this study, we aim to identify the factors that influence intraoperative hemorrhage in CSP and develop a prediction model for hemorrhage risk. We hope that this model will provide a more accurate prediction of hemorrhage risk for patients with CSP and serve as a reference for the timely development of effective interventions. Ultimately, our goal is to improve the prognosis and quality of life for patients. This study is designed as a case-control study. We undertook a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 208 patients with CSP who were admitted between January 2018 and December 2022 and treated with dilation and curettage (including ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage with vacuum aspiration, and hysteroscopic or laparoscopic-guided -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services