Abstract:This paper presents a detailed model-data comparative study of the 17 March 2015 geomagnetic storm using the high-resolution version of the thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamic general circulation model and the total electron content observations from a dense global navigation satellite system network. Driven by time-dependent high-latitude ionospheric convection and auroral precipitation inputs, together with an empirically defined subauroral plasma stream (SAPS) field, our simulation reproduce many observed storm-related ionospheric phenomena, including large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances over Europe, the effects of prompt penetration electric field over South and Central America, and the formation of a storm-enhanced density (SED) plume across the continental United States. Our simulation results reaffirm a number of important characteristics concerning the SED plume: (1) enhanced background ionospheric density is a necessary but not sufficient condition, and enhanced ion drift is required to form the SED plume; (2) the SAPS flow channel does not directly transport the plasma from midnight to postnoon via dusk to form the SED plume, instead, the SED plume is formed at the equatorward and westward edge of the SAPS channel; and (3) the SED plume appears to subcorotate with respect to the Earth. Plain Language Summary Storm-induced ionospheric density variations are a major concern of near-Earth space environment as they could drastically disrupt satellite navigation and telecommunication systems. Although ionospheric disturbances such as traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) and storm-enhanced density (SED) are commonly observed during geomagnetic storms, accurate specification of these phenomena remains a great challenge for geospace models. This paper presents a detailed model-data comparative study of the well-known March 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm. The simulated TIDs and SED structures from the thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamic general circulation model (TIEGCM) are compared with the total electron content observations for a dense global navigation satellite system (GNSS) network over Europe, South and Central America, as well as North America. While the model reproduces many observed storm-related ionospheric features, quantitative differences between the simulation results and the GNSS data indicate that further improvements to the TIEGCM (such as a more realistic, self-consistent electrodynamic coupling of the ionosphere and magnetosphere) are required in order to meet the challenges of space weather specification and eventually forecast. This study not only serves a meaningful validation of our numerical model but also sheds some new lights on an apparent paradox concerning the formation of the SED plume. Key Points We have carried out a detailed model-data comparison as a way to validate the model outputs Our simulation results reproduce many observed features, including traveling ionospheric disturbances and the storm-enhanced density plume Our results shed new lights on the formation of the SED plume and its subcorotation motion

Large‐Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances Over the European Sector During the Geomagnetic Storm on March 23–24, 2023: Energy Deposition in the Source Regions and the Propagation Characteristics

Absence of High Frequency Echoes From Ionosondes During the 23–25 April 2023 Geomagnetic Storm; What Happened?

Multi-Instrument Observation of the Ionospheric Irregularities and Disturbances during the 23–24 March 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Spatial Development of Strong Storm-Induced Ionospheric Perturbations during 25–27 August 2018

Regional Ionospheric Super Bubble Induced by Significant Upward Plasma Drift During the 1 December 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

A Case Study of the Large-Scale Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances in the Eastern Asian Sector During the 2015 St. Patrick's Day Geomagnetic Storm

Significant Midlatitude Plasma Density Peaks and Dual‐Hemisphere SED During the 10–11 May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm

Effects of Subauroral Polarization Streams on Ionospheric Radial Currents During the Geomagnetic Storm on 23 April 2023

Geoelectric fields and geomagnetically induced currents during the April 23–24, 2023 geomagnetic storm

Significant Midlatitude Bubble‐Like Ionospheric Super‐Depletion Structure (BLISS) and Dynamic Variation of Storm‐Enhanced Density Plume During the 23 April 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

The Solar and Geomagnetic Storms in May 2024: A Flash Data Report

Extreme Responses of the Ionospheric Radial Currents to the Main Phase of the Super Geomagnetic Storm on 10 May 2024

Ground-Based GNSS and Satellite Observations of Auroral Ionospheric Irregularities during Geomagnetic Disturbances in August 2018

The Polarity Oscillations of the Equatorial Electrojet in Response to the Geomagnetic Storm on 1 December 2023

Localized Plasma Density Peak at Middle Latitudes During the April 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Global Ionospheric Response During Extreme Geomagnetic Storm in May 2024

Scintillations in Southern Europe during the geomagnetic storm of June 2015: analysis of a plasma bubbles spill-over using ground-based data

Dynamic Expansion and Merging of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly During the 10–11 May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm

East–West Difference in the Ionospheric Response During the Recovery Phase of May 2024 Super Geomagnetic Storm Over the East Asian

Sub-Auroral and Mid-Latitude GNSS ROTI Performance during Solar Cycle 24 Geomagnetic Disturbed Periods: Towards Storm's Early Sensing

Large-Scale Ionospheric Disturbances During the 17 March 2015 Storm: A Model-Data Comparative Study